New lamps for old.

Discussion in 'Brooklyn Nets' started by MisterMontross, Sep 24, 2008.

  1. MisterMontross

    MisterMontross Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2008
    Messages:
    388
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Just asked this question on the bbb forum, so I figured I'd ask it here.

    Do any posters in here think that Nets might trade one or two prospects, and possibly a draft pick for a veteran player that Nets feel might help them make the playoffs?
     
  2. #1_War_Poet_ForLife

    #1_War_Poet_ForLife The Baker of Cakes

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2007
    Messages:
    9,176
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    48
    The possibility is always out there. I don't want it to happen, though.
     
  3. cpawfan

    cpawfan Monsters do exist

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2007
    Messages:
    8,703
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Kiki's goal has always been great players. The Nets assets aren't yet at the point where they can be cashed in for a great player.
     
  4. MisterMontross

    MisterMontross Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2008
    Messages:
    388
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Young prospects, multiple draft picks and expiring contracts. I'd say the Nets have the goods to get an established veteran player that would improve this years team.
     
  5. cpawfan

    cpawfan Monsters do exist

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2007
    Messages:
    8,703
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    38
    You and I are talking about 2 different types of players.
     
  6. MisterMontross

    MisterMontross Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2008
    Messages:
    388
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    18
    To keep this thread going, give me an example of a few players that fit the type you are speaking of.
     
  7. cpawfan

    cpawfan Monsters do exist

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2007
    Messages:
    8,703
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Kiki wants to be able to cash in like Ainge did last summer by getting KG and Ray Allen. Hence all the dreams about trading for Melo or going after LBJ in the summer of 2010.

    Getting a Rasheed Wallace, a Billups or a Jamison would improve the team this season but would cost too much to make it worth giving up assets that will likely be worth more after another year of player development.
     
  8. zєяσ

    zєяσ Truth is beautiful

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2007
    Messages:
    2,222
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I agree with that notion a bit. I don't see the point in trading away youth for a player that isnt gonna help much short or long term (Billups, Camby, JO, Shaq, Maggete, etc...)
     
  9. MisterMontross

    MisterMontross Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2008
    Messages:
    388
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    18
    That's my point. A player like 'Melo, Jamison or Camby possibly gets Nets into the playoffs, but is a hindrance down the line, considering what Nets would have had to have send back in exchange, and held back the kids' development (that's referring to Camby & 'Shweed).

    Lebron is a different story, as he is a (hopefully) future acquisition.
     
  10. cpawfan

    cpawfan Monsters do exist

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2007
    Messages:
    8,703
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Melo is a significant step above and doesn't belong with Jamison and Camby.

    Rod wants to win now as he is getting really old, but Kiki has been the face of the Nets to the media and he plans to take a couple of years (in part for job security)
     
  11. MisterMontross

    MisterMontross Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2008
    Messages:
    388
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Melo is a SF, and Nets are weak right now at the power positions.

    Also, to me, 'Melo is not a difference maker, and is very immature.

    And 'Melo would cost Nets one of their bigman prospects (at least), some expiring contracts, and one draft pick (at least).

    'Melo might (MIGHT) get us into the playoffs for a first round exit, and SEVERELY hamper the Nets future.

    But Ratner might think 'Melo can draw customers, and in the end, thst's what counts, isn't it?
     
  12. cpawfan

    cpawfan Monsters do exist

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2007
    Messages:
    8,703
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Melo is more than worth whatever it would cost to get him. However, he isn't on the market. Melo wouldn't hurt the Nets future one bit as he would be the future.

    I'm not replying anymore to this tangent
     
  13. MisterMontross

    MisterMontross Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2008
    Messages:
    388
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Sorry, I wasn't trying to provoke you.

    I was just expressing my honest opinion of Carmelo.

    We obviously have different opinions of Mr. Anthony.

    He certainly could mature in the near future. But from what I've seen thus far, Carmelo wouldn't get Nets past the first round, if Nets were to make the playoffs.
     
  14. Petey

    Petey Super Sized Sexy, The Bulls Fan Killer! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2007
    Messages:
    4,042
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    38
    That would be a steal.

    -Petey
     
  15. MisterMontross

    MisterMontross Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2008
    Messages:
    388
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    18
    On the part of which team?
     
  16. zєяσ

    zєяσ Truth is beautiful

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2007
    Messages:
    2,222
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Take this into consideration: we arguably gave more for VC.
     
  17. YehYeh

    YehYeh netsnut

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2008
    Messages:
    97
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    8
    The key for a GM is to build value in player assets. With assets he can trade for whatever he needs to go for a championship. Kiki so far sold high and bought low, which to me is a sound strategy. To trade away young players and futures for vets makes no business sense. Most fans will rather get excited about a budding star than a meek first round exit. So even at the box office young studs make more sense.
     
  18. Dumpy

    Dumpy Yi-ha!!

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2007
    Messages:
    4,231
    Likes Received:
    24
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I think the opposite of whatever anyone on BBB thinks.
     
  19. MisterMontross

    MisterMontross Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2008
    Messages:
    388
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Yes. Nets got taken on that deal.
     
  20. MisterMontross

    MisterMontross Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2008
    Messages:
    388
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    18
    I'll keep that in mind.

    I may have to throw some of that back at you.
     

Share This Page