So.... After week 5....

Discussion in 'NFC East' started by Vintage, Oct 6, 2008.

  1. Vintage

    Vintage Defeating Communism...

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2003
    Messages:
    4,822
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    38
    What position do you think Dallas is most in need of improving at?
     
  2. bacon smeller

    bacon smeller The Baconater

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    688
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    Bacon Island
    Well the defense is doing good but a little improvement wouldn't hurt. Also Romo must not be afraid of the pressure that the team puts on him.
     
  3. Vintage

    Vintage Defeating Communism...

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2003
    Messages:
    4,822
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I think our coverage units (special teams) is erratic. They looked really good, until the end; then they looked horrible.

    As for specific positions... DE is coming to mind. We are getting no pass rush from any DE. And their run defense has been pretty hit or miss. Its Ratliff.... then not much else.
     
  4. GMJ

    GMJ Suspended

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2007
    Messages:
    12,067
    Likes Received:
    30
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Defensive schemes; that includes blitzing packages and coverage schemes. We're under utilizing all the talent we have on there.
     
  5. Vintage

    Vintage Defeating Communism...

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2003
    Messages:
    4,822
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Agreed. Pacman had his best game of the year. Coincidence he played more man coverage today than in previous games? I think not.

    Our coverage schemes are driving me through the roof.

    I understand it to a certain point (with Newman out right now; we are relying on: Henry (who has struggled this season), Jones, Jenkins (rookie), Scandrick (rookie) as our CBs.... and we are now down to our 3rd string SS.

    But when we get healthy... we better play more man. There is no excuse not to.
     

Share This Page