Ultimate Game Breakdown-Players: Nuggets 118 T-Wolves 95 (Oct 9, Preseason)

Discussion in 'Denver Nuggets' started by tremaine, Oct 19, 2008.

  1. tremaine

    tremaine To Win, Be Like Fitz

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2006
    Messages:
    1,192
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    writer, accountant & part time economist
    Location:
    North of great majority of Canadians
    Ultimate Game Breakdown-Players: Nuggets 118 T-Wolves 95 (Oct 10, Preseason)

    This is much of what an Ultimate Game Breakdown-Players is going to look like for the new season. There will be some commentary included for a regular season game, but most of the game and team commentary will be in the separate "Game and Team Reports."

    With an Ultimate Game Breakdown-Players, you can see very rapidly who was most responsible for the winning or the losing of the game. Then someone like me can easily write a separate game report which explains how things might have worked out better for a team, or why things worked out just about as well as possible, as the case may be.

    The Real Player Ratings formula has been very carefully and accurately tweaked again and is currently as follows:

    POSITIVE FACTORS
    Points 1.00 (at par)
    Number of 3-Pt FGs Made 1.00
    Number of 2-Pt FGs Made 0.60
    Number of FTs Made 0.00

    Assists 1.75

    Offensive Rebounds 1.15
    Defensive Rebounds 1.25
    Blocks 1.60
    Steals 2.10

    NEGATIVE FACTORS
    3-Pt FGs Missed -1.00
    2-Pt FGs Missed -0.85
    FTs Missed -0.85

    Turnovers -2.00
    Personal Fouls -0.80

    ACTUAL COMBINED AWARD OR PENALTY BY TYPE OF SHOT
    3-Pointer Made 4.00
    2-Pointer Made 2.60
    Free Throw Made 1.00
    3-Pointer Missed -1.00
    2-Pointer Missed -0.85
    Free Throw Missed -0.85

    ZERO POINTS: PERCENTAGES BELOW WHICH THERE IS A NEGATIVE NET RESULT
    3-Pointer 0 score % 0.200
    2-Pointer 0 score % 0.246
    1-Pointer 0 score % 0.459

    ASSISTS VERSUS TURNOVERS ZERO POINT
    Assists vs Turnovers 0.533
    Assist/Turnover Ratio 1.143

    NOTES ON HOW TO USE ULTIMATE GAME BREAKDOWN RPR/RPP REPORTS
    RPR game reports show for each player the RPR (Real Player Rating) which tells you how good a player did (the good things minus the bad things) out on the court per unit of time. The RPP (Real Player Production) report tells you how much in total (the sum of the of the good things minus the sum of the bad things) a player did out on the court.

    Many and maybe most sports watchers and an unknown but probably disturbingly large number of sports managers make the mistakes of exaggerating the importance of quantity and overlooking to some extent quality. These reports allow you to expand your horizons. These reports put quantity and quality side by side, which is extremely valuable, because both are roughly equally important in explaining accurately why and how the game turned out the way it did.

    Players who over many games consistently have higher RPR (quality) but lower RPP (quantity) results are in many cases not getting enough playing time. Players that over many games consistently have lower RPR (quality) but higher RPP (quantity) results are in many cases getting too much playing time.

    The exceptional cases are very often going to be players who are either truly outstanding defenders or truly bad defenders. This is because the one and only thing that is not counted, because it is impossible to calculate it, is the number of shots that a player prevents from being scores. Investigation has to date revealed that, apparently, no one has even attempted, for the NBA, rough estimates of the actual value of each player's defending, in terms of number or percentage of scores prevented, or in terms of number or percentage of possessions made worthless.

    Another exception. where it is really alright when it looks like a player is playing too much, will be if a team has a point guard who has many more turnovers than the average point guard has. Because the point guard is so important, a good coach has to play his best guard who can make plays at the position for a full set of minutes every game, pretty much regardless of how many turnovers that player makes. If you take out your designated point guard due to "too many turnovers," it's most often going to be sort of like cutting your foot off because you have a bad case of athletes foot!

    Over the coming year, I am going to be working to see if it is possible to use some combination of advanced statistics that are tracked on certain internet sites as an accurate proxy for the number of shots and/or for the number of possessions ruined by a defender.

    REAL PLAYER RATINGS
    RPR 2.0B NUGGETS 118 TIMBERWOLVES 95 (Preseason Game Oct 9 2008)
    MINNESOTA QUALITY
    Corey Brewer, SF 1.003
    Al Jefferson, PF 0.782
    Mike Miller, SG 0.675
    Blake Ahearn, PG 0.596
    Sebastian Telfair, PG 0.558
    Randy Foye, PG 0.508
    Kevin Love, F 0.438
    Ryan Gomes, PF 0.372
    Chris Richard, PF 0.175
    Mark Madsen, PF 0.137
    Rodney Carney, SF -0.083

    DENVER QUALITY
    Renaldo Balkman, SF 2.600
    Chris Andersen, PF 1.550
    Ruben Patterson, SF 1.504
    Steven Hunter, PF 1.167
    Smush Parker, PG 1.092
    Kenyon Martin, PF 0.979
    J.R. Smith, SG 0.908
    Nene Hilario, PF 0.852
    Dahntay Jones, SG 0.743
    Linas Kleiza, SF 0.633
    Allen Iverson, SG 0.598
    Juwan Howard, PF 0.521
    Anthony Carter, PG 0.319

    SCALE FOR RPR (QUALITY) RATINGS FOR A SINGLE GAME
    Historic Superstar for this game 1.200 and more
    Superstar 1.000 1.199
    Star 0.800 0.999
    Outstanding 0.625 0.799
    Major Role Player 0.525 0.624
    Role Player 0.450 0.524
    Minor Role Player 0.400 0.449
    Very Minor Role Player or Very Important Defender 0.350 0.399
    Poor Game or Extremely Importand Defender 0.275 0.349
    Very Poor Game Regardless of Defending 0.200 0.274
    Disaster Game Regardless of Defending and less 0.199


    REAL PLAYER PRODUCTION
    MINNESOTA QUANTITY
    Al Jefferson, PF 25.80
    Sebastian Telfair, PG 18.40
    Corey Brewer, SF 16.05
    Randy Foye, PG 15.75
    Blake Ahearn, PG 13.70
    Kevin Love, F 10.95
    Ryan Gomes, PF 8.55
    Mike Miller, SG 6.75
    Chris Richard, PF 2.45
    Mark Madsen, PF 2.05
    Rodney Carney, SF -1.00

    DENVER QUANTITY
    Chris Andersen, PF 27.90
    J.R. Smith, SG 23.60
    Renaldo Balkman, SF 23.40
    Ruben Patterson, SF 21.05
    Kenyon Martin, PF 20.55
    Nene Hilario, PF 18.75
    Dahntay Jones, SG 16.35
    Smush Parker, PG 14.20
    Allen Iverson, SG 13.75
    Linas Kleiza, SF 13.30
    Steven Hunter, PF 10.50
    Anthony Carter, PG 6.70
    Juwan Howard, PF 6.25

    SCALE FOR RPP (QUANTITY) RATINGS FOR A SINGLE GAME
    STARTERS
    Happens only a few times a year in the NBA 45.0 and more
    Massive and Memorable Game 40.0 44.9
    Huge Game 35.0 39.9
    Very Big Game 30.0 34.9
    Big Game 25.0 29.9
    Typical Average Game 20.0 24.9
    Somewhat Below Average Game 16.0 19.9
    Way Below Average Game 12.0 15.9
    Bad Game 9.0 11.9
    Really Bad Game 5.0 8.9
    Total Disaster and less 4.9

    NON-STARTERS
    Massive and Memorable Game 35.0 and more
    Huge Game 30.0 34.9
    Very Big Game 25.0 29.9
    Big Game 20.0 24.9
    Typical Non-Starter Game 14.0 19.9
    Below Average Even For a Non-Starter 9.0 13.9
    Way Below Average Even For a Non-Starter 5.0 8.9
    Bad Game Even For a Non-Starter 2.0 4.9
    Disaster: Nothing Much to Report and less 1.9


    THE HIGH QUALITY PLAYERS IN THIS GAME

    [​IMG]

    OUTSTANDING QUALITY GAMES FOR THE NUGGETS

    Historic Superstar Level During Minutes on the Court: Renaldo Balkman
    [​IMG]

    Historic Superstar Level During Minutes on the Court: Chris Andersen
    [​IMG]

    Historic Superstar Level During Minutes on the Court Ruben Patterson
    [​IMG]

    Superstar Level During Minutes on the Court: Steven Hunter
    [​IMG]

    Superstar Level During Minutes on the Court: Smush Parker
    [​IMG]

    Superstar Level During Minutes on the Court: Kenyon Martin
    [​IMG]

    Star Level During Minutes on the Court: JR Smith
    [​IMG]

    Star Level During Minutes on the Court: Nene
    [​IMG]

    OUTSTANDING QUALITY GAMES FOR THE T-WOLVES

    [​IMG]
    Superstar Level During Minutes on the Court: Corey Brewer
    [​IMG]

    Star Level During Minutes on the Court: Al Jefferson
    [​IMG]


    POWER PERFORMERS

    [​IMG]

    NUGGETS STARTERS POWER PERFORMERS
    NONE, because it was a preseason game and minutes were limited.

    NUGGETS NON-STARTERS POWER PERFORMERS
    Very Big Game: Chris Andersen
    [​IMG]

    Big Game: JR Smith
    [​IMG]

    Big Game: Renaldo Balkman
    [​IMG]

    Big Game: Ruben Patterson
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]


    T-WOLVES STARTERS POWER PERFORMERS
    NONE, because it was a preseason game and minutes were limited.

    T-WOLVES NON-STARTERS POWER PERFORMERS
    NONE, mostly because it was a preseason game and minutes were limited.

    Note: For the rundown of the best players and the power performers, I bump up or bump down, by one category, certain players, due to adjustments for defending, wherever such adjustments are obvious.
     
    Last edited: Oct 19, 2008
  2. DynastYWarrioR6

    DynastYWarrioR6 JBB SmurfY

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2005
    Messages:
    7,091
    Likes Received:
    25
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Irvine, CA
    Good lord Tremaine. This is nice and thorough...good job.
     
  3. tremaine

    tremaine To Win, Be Like Fitz

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2006
    Messages:
    1,192
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    writer, accountant & part time economist
    Location:
    North of great majority of Canadians
    Now that I've done the trial run, I could show the ugly details of how the Lakers destroyed the Nuggets. I'm deciding whether I should do that, or just focus on the right now.

    Should I have mercy on the Nuggets organization by not showing the playoff series, or not?
     
  4. kyteless

    kyteless New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2008
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Interesting. i like what you've done here. i'll be following this for sure.
     

Share This Page