Nate, Lee or Both?

Discussion in 'New York Knicks' started by Mr. J, Dec 16, 2008.

?

What Should the Knicks Do?

  1. Re-sign Nate

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%

  2. Re-sign Lee

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%

  3. Re-sign both

    4 vote(s)
    80.0%

  4. Trade one of them to unload a bad contract (Curry, Jeffries)

    1 vote(s)
    20.0%

  5. Other

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. Mr. J

    Mr. J Triple Up

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2004
    Messages:
    9,912
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    New York, NY
    Should the Knicks lock up Nate Lee or both of them when their contracts expire?
     
    Mr. J, Dec 16, 2008
    #1
  2. speeds

    speeds $2.50 highball, $1.50 beer Staff Member Administrator GFX Team

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2007
    Messages:
    39,366
    Likes Received:
    3,383
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Calgary, AB
    I voted 'keep both'. The team will be completely flushed out in 2010, especially if Curry declines his last option year. The remaining team should include those two plus Chandler and Gallinari.
     
    speeds, Dec 16, 2008
    #2
  3. J_Ray

    J_Ray JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2005
    Messages:
    5,402
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Why would Curry turn down his last big paycheck? I really think they should trade one, and it has to be Nate Robinson over Lee IMO. Lee is a stud and legitimate PF while Nate Robinson will forever be a 5'9" SG.
     
    J_Ray, Dec 16, 2008
    #3
  4. Mr. J

    Mr. J Triple Up

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2004
    Messages:
    9,912
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    New York, NY
    Nate has been outplaying Lee though. 16/4/4 off the bench puts him in contention for 6th Man of the Year.
     
    Mr. J, Dec 20, 2008
    #4

Share This Page