Just curious, why is no one talking Michael Redd?

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by BrianFromWA, Jan 3, 2009.

  1. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,073
    Likes Received:
    9,027
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I mean, a sweet-shooting SG/SF who has a big contract on a small-market team battling for the 8th spot? A guy who is such a choirboy he makes Roy look like a thug? Savvy Vet scorer?

    Is he too old? (29) Is he on a team that deems him Untouchable? I wouldn't think so. Is he a bad use of our cap space?
     
  2. Entity

    Entity some guy

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2008
    Messages:
    1,761
    Likes Received:
    25
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Occupation:
    Full-Time Student, E.E.
    Location:
    Aloha, OR
    Not a great defender or passer. We could put Rudy in at the three if we wanted that kind of game, although Redd's is way more developed, and Rudy will get better at some point. He may or may not ever get Redd good, but I'd rather have a guy that can guard the perimeter at the three.
     
  3. oldmangrouch

    oldmangrouch persona non grata

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    12,402
    Likes Received:
    6,323
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The contract is pretty ugly. The bigger problem, in my mind, is that his tool kit doesn't fit with our problems. He won't improve the "D", he won't improve ball movement, and he won't make us any less jump-shot dependent.

    At $16 mil this season, $17 mil next season, and $18 mil the year after - I would hope for more than marginal improvement!
     
  4. ucatchtrout

    ucatchtrout Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    1,461
    Likes Received:
    47
    Trophy Points:
    48
    one dimensional player with large contract who is twenty nine years old. not enough upside.
     
  5. Masbee

    Masbee -- Rookie of the Year

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,856
    Likes Received:
    97
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Redd is a poor fit for the Blazer team. Doesn't defend, which we need badly. Is a black hole offensively, slowing ball movement. Doesn't make the bigs better.

    I doubt KP is interested unless we were offered Redd for "free", and there were no other better deals out there.
     
  6. craigehlo

    craigehlo Elite Wing

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    6,200
    Likes Received:
    2,328
    Trophy Points:
    113
    He's a little too short to play SF and would hurt us on the boards. I like his ability to get to the FT line though.

    Richard Jefferson is the guy on the Bucks who's the obvious fit.
     
  7. BalancedMan

    BalancedMan That's out of context....

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    1,318
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Atlanta GA / Harrisburg PA
    Not a fan of Redd. For reasons already stated.
     
  8. drexlersdad

    drexlersdad SABAS

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    4,825
    Likes Received:
    255
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    NEW New Hampshire
    Redd is money from outside, but not really the player we need. he is a sg.
     
  9. JFizzleRaider

    JFizzleRaider Yeast Lords Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2007
    Messages:
    13,454
    Likes Received:
    6,322
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Who Knows?
    Agree with the statements already made. Dude is bad at defense, not what I would want from our 3.
     
  10. Nikolokolus

    Nikolokolus There's always next year

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    30,704
    Likes Received:
    6,198
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Redd has never been a small forward, and at 6'6" isn't likely to be a good candidate to start at this late stage of his career.

    I asked Santa for a Gerald Wallace and I'm still holding out hope that the package just got lost in the mail
     
  11. discovery69

    discovery69 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2009
    Messages:
    23
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Redd biggest problem is that he wouldn't fit the chemistry of the Blazers of "team" first.

    Redd had problems the Bucks when he was concerned that he wouldn't get as many shots as he thought he should when Jefferson arrived.

    Also, Redd is also known to be a prima donna when it comes to practice. He doesn't go all out in practice or will skip practices.... "he likes to save his best for the games".....
     
  12. Minstrel

    Minstrel Top Of The Pops Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    26,226
    Likes Received:
    14,407
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    User Interface Designer
    Location:
    Hello darkness, my old friend
    Maybe a Valentine's Day gift. From Santa. Err, so to speak.
     
  13. alex42083

    alex42083 Thanks Brandon

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2008
    Messages:
    7,789
    Likes Received:
    47
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Occupation:
    Writing about sports
    Location:
    Canby, Wilsonville, Portland
    I really like Redd's game, but have to agree that he doesn't fit in too well with us. He doesn't have great handles, and of course, doesn't play D.
    Caron Butler, let's get him!
     
  14. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    92,741
    Likes Received:
    55,376
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    I would have loved Michael Redd on this team four years ago when we had Zach. Now, with Roy on the team, Redd wouldn't fit. Redd is a guy who needs about 20 shots a game to be effective. He's a money shooter, but we have a lot of guys who can shoot from long range. We really need slashers and post up guys imo.
     
  15. craigehlo

    craigehlo Elite Wing

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    6,200
    Likes Received:
    2,328
    Trophy Points:
    113
    http://www.nypost.com/seven/0123200...r_making_his_mark_on_lakers_151520.htm?page=0
     
  16. Magnum

    Magnum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    70
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Location:
    New York
    We might have offered Raef for him, which one might consider garbage.

    I think it comes down to them battling for a playoff spot and not wanting to disrupt that.
     
  17. hasoos

    hasoos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    9,418
    Likes Received:
    97
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I would take Jefferson before Redd. :tsktsk:
     
  18. Nikolokolus

    Nikolokolus There's always next year

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    30,704
    Likes Received:
    6,198
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This is exactly the kind of quote you'd expect a team to put out there when they are trying to gauge the interest of other teams and are trying to set baseline negotiating "price" about what they are willing to take in trade. None of the above mentioned teams seem particularly desperate to add a shooting guard to their rotation based on who they already have (Roy, Ginobli, Terry) although I suppose Dallas could have interest.
     
  19. Fez Hammersticks

    Fez Hammersticks スーパーバッド Zero Cool

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    28,935
    Likes Received:
    9,593
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Phone Psychic
    Location:
    The Deep State, US and A.
    I wonder if he'd change his attitude on a team where he is clearly not the best player and a coach that demands every player to push hard in practice.
     
  20. Nikolokolus

    Nikolokolus There's always next year

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    30,704
    Likes Received:
    6,198
    Trophy Points:
    113
    How is this any different from Scott Skiles?
     

Share This Page