Re: Keeping Pietrus a 'priority' <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Keeping Pietrus Is A 'Priority' For WarriorsSF Chronicle - 03/07 - 11:17 AM ESTChris Mullin insists it's a "priority" to keep Pietrus beyond his rookie contract, which runs through the end of next season.The Warriors will have trouble doing it without going into the luxury tax, and Pietrus is having trouble proving he deserves a lucrative extension. [READ]</div> If he is such a priority then why did they sign Mike Dunleavy to that big contract?
Re: Keeping Pietrus a 'priority' <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BCB @ Mar 7 2006, 10:58 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>If he is such a priority then why did they sign Mike Dunleavy to that big contract?</div>To keep both players and see how they develop. Whoever works out better in the future they will keep and most likely trade the other. They saw a major upside in Dunleavy so they gave him a big contract.
Re: Keeping Pietrus a 'priority' <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BCB @ Mar 7 2006, 10:58 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>If he is such a priority then why did they sign Mike Dunleavy to that big contract?</div>I think because he didn't become such a priority until his play this season when he knock Dunleavy out of the starting lineup for awhile.
