I'm also factoring in the defense San Antonio loses in the guys they'd be sending out for Carter (Hill, Mason, Bowen). Before George Hill was even drafted his defense was reported as NBA ready, and he hasn't disappointed. Not too many rookies are great defenders. He's one of them. Duncan is not the reason Hill is a good defender. He helps certainly, but he doesn't make the guy. San Antonio already has three stars, they don't need another, and they definitely don't need to hock their bench to get one. The Spurs can win in the playoffs without being an offensive juggernaut. They've done it a few times already. They'll be able to put up enough points in the playoffs and let their defense win their games. Adding offense and subtracting defense is a pointless move that they've never had to do in the past, and they don't need to do it now. Money isn't the factor. Its the return package.
Bowen is playing 20 minutes a game. Fabricio plays 12. Are you going to cry about losing them when you're getting a rejuvenated Carter back? Hell, make up for Fabricio and give them Boone, if they really want him. Mason is a three point shooter who plays good D. Hill seems like he could be a solid role player in this league. If that's all you're giving up for Carter, you do it.
If this is true, it does possibly prove that Pritchard isn't interested in a star player at the end of his prime. That narrows down the list a bit. Portland could offer a more tantalizing deal if interested.
THOSE AREN'T EVEN THE GUYS I'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT THIS WHOLE TIME!!! WHAT THE FUCK DO PEOPLE READ ANYMORE????? Hill plays great D. Both are role players who perform their roles very well and both contribute to the Spurs, and in no small way either. Take either of them away from the Spurs, and they'll be missed. Take both of them away, that's a huge blow to the Spurs depth. Hopefully R.C. Buford is a lot smarter than you are. I'm optimistic.
