how about the fact that Boston wasn't going anywhere last season before they got A Walk back and then right away went on a 12 game winning streak lost 1 game then went on another impressive winning streak and then made the playoffs and took Indiana to a 7th game that I still say they should of won because that last game was in Boston and everything was just perfect for them to advance.
seriously, what is this guys obsession w/ Toine? hey, did you notice the game he was suspended from? WE WON BY 31!. This team was fine without him.
My All Time Teams are good because unlike everyone else I dont just stack my team with all stars. I use key players as well that can get the job done. Players that played big roles on there teams. Such as Ron Harper with the 2000 Lakers, Rodman with his Rebounds on the 1999 Lakers, Id go on but I have to go now.
hahaha :HAHAHA:you're not supposed to have role players on all-time teams. The best players are supposed to be rewarded. hahahahahaha :HAHAHA: :HAHAHA:
Thank you lol. The noobs were ganging up on me in that all-time Lakers thread and trying to make me look like the idiot.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (nba dogmatist @ Mar 25 2006, 02:33 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>yeah, well, for saying something that wrong, your opinion doesn't count. </div>Agreed lol
Ok....so your saying that Antoine Walker is better then Paul Pierce because thats what you are implying when u say he should be on the list. And I have no idea how u can say that after everybody has seen Paul Pierces stats in the 2nd half of this year. And if your saying that some of the other guys on that list shouldnt be on there; they were NBA champs and I dont think Antoine has ever made it to the finals....so good call on that one
the closest he's been is w/ the Cs in the ECF run. He's also been w/ the Mavs (2nd rd. i think) and the Hawks (oviously no playoffs). He might make the finals this year tho.. maybe
