Definitely Lamar Odom. He is a better driver, better defender though they both make boneheaded plays a lot. Odom is just a little more talented.
Lamar, Antoine is not the player he used to be (he wasn't that great to begin with) and he's way too lazy, Lamar is much better.
Odom. Odom can handle the bal well, he has range and he is an outstanding rebounder. Walker has range as well and a good rebounder but he shoots at a low percentage and takes way too many 3 pointers.
Is this a joke? When odom decides to play he's an elite player in the league. It's just his mentality that is holding him back.
Odom, better ball-handling, more patient on offense, by far more active on the boards, and isnt out of shape.
Lamar Odom.When he decides to play like he did in the Clippers hes crazy. He almost ha a triple double yesterday.
I would almost pick anyone over Walker. Walker is not a good chemistry type player. He has made every team worse that he has been on except the celtics.
Haha he made us worse, trust me. He was good when he came back after being in Atlanta, other than he sucked for a few years.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (JustBlaze @ Mar 16 2006, 09:36 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Haha he made us worse, trust me. He was good when he came back after being in Atlanta, other than he sucked for a few years.</div>You guys made the Eastern Conference finals with Walker
One year, and after that season he just got lazy and whiney.That was also Paul's best season until now, and he was the star of the team. That team was solid all around, Kenny Andersom, Eric Williams, it was a good team. Antoine was not the reason we came within 2 games of the Finals.
Walker averaged like 5.8 3's per game a while ago which is just not good. He shot at a low percentage too. He stopped jacking up 3's but he still takes way too many ouitside shots.
Odom, everyone has stated why hes so much better.Antoine is a loser that takes bad shots and doesnt use his brain enough...
