There have been some horrible comparisons, well people trying to compare some player to another player, where Im still trying to figure how they would try to compare them..but I thought this one might be interesting:Charlie Villanueva vs Channing FryeSimilar in some ways... what do you think?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (The Lefty @ Mar 19 2006, 07:14 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>There have been some horrible comparisons, well people trying to compare some player to another player, where Im still trying to figure how they would try to compare them..but I thought this one might be interesting:Charlie Villanueva vs Channing FryeSimilar in some ways... what do you think?</div>I think that's the second minor shot you've taken at this board today? HaHa No worries
i don't think they are very similar. CV is much more rough then frye and he is a good inside player. i'd take Villa. better stats and he can play better defense.
Umm..hmm lol, I happen to like them both, but I like Villanueva more just because I think he's doing more than what Frye is.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (MiNiMaTrIx @ Mar 22 2006, 08:40 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Umm..hmm lol, I happen to like them both, but I like Villanueva more just because I think he's doing more than what Frye is.</div>lmfao Watch a Knicks game and see how much of the team Frye is. Him Lee and Nate are basically the team, or atleast the only players that try most the time. Charlie has guys like Bosh and James backing him up. Right now CVill has a better game because he can post up and he is more rough, but Frye is more agile and has the better jumper. Once Frye learns to play off the dribble and post up, he will become a much better player.
I'll take CVill bc of his versatility. He can pretty much play 3 positions, and he can do alot on the court. He can hit the 3, post up, and play defense. I've noticed that he just knows how to play. He's very good at feeding off of Bosh's double teams; He finds seams and openings that rookies shouldn't find. He'd be an okay 2nd option and good 3rd option on a team.
I don't think NBA fans fully understand the awesome potential Charlie Villanueva has. He can play both forward spots, he is a solid perimeter defender with long arms and great agility for being 6'11". He shoots over everyone, he runs the floor, good ball handeler and passer. I don't see any reason to pick Channing Frye over Villanueva.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BCB @ Mar 26 2006, 01:52 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I don't think NBA fans fully understand the awesome potential Charlie Villanueva has. He can play both forward spots, he is a solid perimeter defender with long arms and great agility for being 6'11". He shoots over everyone, he runs the floor, good ball handeler and passer. I don't see any reason to pick Channing Frye over Villanueva.</div>He can play the 3, 4 and 5 which is simply amazing. Most of the time, he actually plays Center for us.
