Doesn't that actually disappoint evolutionists, because they don't believe Dinosaurs and humans walked the earth together because Dinosaurs are from so long ago... The Evolutionary theory states that everything evolved over millions of years. Evolutionists say that dinosaurs came from six million years back. They also say that the Earth is four to six billion years old. They say that fifty million years ago there was horses no bigger than dogs, and birds as tall as man, three hundred million years ago giant dragon flies buzzed around in the large forests, six million years ago small animals, called trilobites, lived in the sea and were rulers of the world. Evolutionists think that the world started off with just plants on it, then came many- legged animals from the sea (walking fish) that took over. They feel that a certain kind of fish evolved into the first four-footed animals. After millions of years those animals tuned into dinosaurs. That is how dinosaurs got started. Then finally the dinosaurs died off and little, furry, four-legged creatures appeared. These animals were called mammals, which then took over the world. Then those mammals evolved into man. The Evolutionists believe, very strongly, that dinosaurs were extinct millions of years before there were even any people to walk the Earth. Christian view... "Look at the behemoth which I made along with you and which feeds on grass like an ox. What strength he has in his loins, what power in the muscles of his belly! His tail sways like a ceder; the sinews of his thighs are close-knit. His bones are tubes among the works of God, yet his maker can approach him with His sword. The hills bring them their produce, and all the wild animals play nearby. Under the lotus plant he lies..." -Job 41:15-24
Uhm, no, it doesn't. There is nothing in the quoted article that suggests in any way that dinosaurs and humans were contemporaries. barfo
Then finally the dinosaurs died off and little, furry, four-legged creatures appeared. These animals were called mammals, which then took over the world. Then those mammals evolved into man. not sure what this means then...
I don't understand your confusion. What is the inconsistency you are objecting to, specifically? barfo
Yep! From your article on Predator X: According to this article about megalodon: http://www.redorbit.com/news/science/1509266/megalodons_bite_strongest_according_to_computer_models/
It hasn't aged gracefully. It's now also being theorized, by a segment of paleontologists, as more of a scavenger than a predator. Soon, it'll turn out to have been the prehistoric version of Santa Claus, with candy canes for teeth.
The T-Rex was made into an icon during the first two Jurassic Park movies. Then when it was discovered that it couldn't even run at a great speed. That's when things started to plummet.
Velociraptors were made out to be badasses by Jurassic Park as well. Unfortunately they were misnamed by Crichton because Velociraptors were about 3 feet tall and ate dino eggs. The Velociraptors as popularized by Jurassic Park are called Deinonychus.
I see your Megalodon and raise you a Argentinosaurus, which grew to be about 120 feet and over 100 tons.
Plant-eaters hardly count. This is an apex predator showdown. The prehistoric equivalent of "tiger vs. polar bear."
Ah, want to play that game eh? OK, I see your Megalodon and raise you a Blue Whale which comes in at 108 feet and 172 tons. Although their pray tends to be on the microscopic side they are still a predator.
You're just mad that I trumped your Predator X. But, I'm sorry to report, blue whales don't qualify as "apex predators" because they aren't at the top of their food chain. Orcas prey on blue whales. I can only imagine (with some sympathy for the blue whale) what a megalodon would do to a blue whale. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_apex_predators
