You mean when Grainger sat down don't you, because he's had an effect on the score, Bayless has not. And +6 with Bayless means the team is +16 without him so there's a measure of the damage he does to us when he plays. Luckily (or more likely by design) Nate picked 2 teams on the skids to give him burn or we'd have 2 losses from the failed gamble.
Did Rice & MB say what's wrong? I've got the Pacer guys... am not looking forward to going to the Cavs game to see nice guy Frye in action tomorrow night. What's the injury?
I like our game plan a lot actually. Granny Danger is getting his, but we are keeping the rest of the team in a headlock. With a team like this, you want them to lean on one player and forget how to play team ball.
I think the fact that Bayless is in there over Sergio supports my argument and that McMillan agrees with me. He is the one that made the switch, and a good switch it has been.
