Yep, it was in retaliation for Thomas throwing Stockton to the ground. I miss old school NBA, it was so much fun.
Number 1 is in red Number 2 is in blue (well this one's just an ironic and biased statement more than anything and helps enhance number 3's comedic value) Number 3 is in purple
Good job. None of those are contradictions. Me calling him classless and being classless myself isn't a contradiction. I didn't say I was not. So fail on 1. #2, since you now missed it twice, and was th epoint I tried to stress, is the effect ON THE COURT. Him barking like a dog is not helping his team in any way. Does it annoy people? Sure. Is it annoying in the way a player might flop and gain a competitive edge for histeam by drawing a ful? No. So try to follow along. #3 was referring to getting under fans skin, and again, does nothing to help them win, even though 2 and 3 go together. So nice try, but you failed miserably, and I didn't contradict myself at all in that paragraph, let alone the three times you claimed.
Sure it is. Be better than the person/act you're criticizing. Common sense. Calling him a big classless meanie and then reveling in his injury is a pretty blatant contradiction. Or maybe hypocrisy would be better. So Przybilla can do his thing to try and get under the other team's skin, but Garnett can't because he's annoying? lolkwut Does nothing to help them win? You already said its an attempt to get under the players' skin, so there's obviously some competitive undertones there.
Am I hypocrite for critizing Sergio and saying he has a terrible jump shot . . . even though he has a better jump shot than me (he doesn't, but for argument sake)?
That Rockets forum is a riot! The posters sound like a combination of under-educated middle schoolers and people that English is their second or third language. Upset over a minor flop? What about the fouls before that where he stood his ground and nothing was called?
No, not a surprising question though, since you're always looking to string together unrelated points.
