So KP is planning on picking Blake and Outlaw back up.

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by hasoos, Jun 5, 2009.

  1. hasoos

    hasoos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    9,418
    Likes Received:
    97
    Trophy Points:
    48
  2. RickyRubio

    RickyRubio He Hate Me

    Joined:
    May 27, 2009
    Messages:
    892
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    18
    I am worried about resigning Outlaw. Not worried about Blake. I just think Outlaw is on the decline of his career. Unless we keep him in hopes that he can have a good first half of the season and trade him before the deadline if the right deal comes along.
     
  3. Pinwheel1

    Pinwheel1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    23,192
    Likes Received:
    15,646
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It is a no brainer to me. Based on their salaries you would be stupid not to. Even if you want to replace them they have value in a trade. But again based on their salaries they are at the very least excellent role players. The only debate is what are their roles.
     
  4. LittleAlex

    LittleAlex Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    2,824
    Likes Received:
    54
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I can sort of see keeping Blake, though he is coming off of shoulder surgery.

    I don't see any reason why they would keep Outlaw, though. He killed his trade value in the playoffs by not even bothering to show up.

    It's comments like these that make me believe KP is going to come up empty this off season. If he values these two extremely mediocre players this highly, how much does he value players who are actually good?

    Far too much, I would say.
     
  5. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,096
    Likes Received:
    9,073
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think they said that:
    If they're not on our team, we can't pick up their options. :) There's a scenario.
     
  6. hasoos

    hasoos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    9,418
    Likes Received:
    97
    Trophy Points:
    48
    The thing that makes this stuff so hard to figure out is that if I was KP, I would say I was picking them up too. The reason being:

    1. If they are back on the team, I want them to feel wanted.
    2. I don't want other teams to be able to make plans based upon released information, such as who will be a free agent, and who will not.
    3. If you don't have them under contract, you can't use them as trade value.

    Now on the other end of the scale, once again, my mind runs with the fact that I wonder if KP is too loyal to the guys he has here. Is he too close to them to make an objective decision? Or is it the fact that if not for a few injuries, he think this team can contend? It could be either, neither, or both.
     
  7. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,096
    Likes Received:
    9,073
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And in the article, they got the 52M cap number wrong. Blake and Outlaw aren't committed to yet, so the number's around 45M
     
  8. hasoos

    hasoos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    9,418
    Likes Received:
    97
    Trophy Points:
    48
    He very straight forwardly said that was with Blake, Oden and a 1st round draft pick included.
     
  9. SteelBlaze1

    SteelBlaze1 Steeler/Blazer fan

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Messages:
    118
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    Oregon
    I don't understand re-signing either of them, but that is why I am not the GM. I trust KP and hope he has a plan.
     
  10. oldmangrouch

    oldmangrouch persona non grata

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    12,403
    Likes Received:
    6,325
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Reality check:

    As mediocre as Blake and Outlaw are, you better have a plan for replacing them before you throw them out of the lifeboat.

    Do you really want to see 30 MPG from Sergio? Do you want to have Webster as our only "safety" net if anything happens to Batum? Do you want naked pictures of Rosie O'Donnel as your screen-saver?
     
  11. Tortimer

    Tortimer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2008
    Messages:
    2,863
    Likes Received:
    72
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Seaside, Oregon
    It's a no brainer that we have to pickup both Blake and Outlaw at their salaries. The only case would be if someone wants to offer us a trade of something we can't refuse and need the cap space. I'm pretty frustrated with both at times but they are both worth far more then their options and we would be crazy to not pick them up. Now if we make a offer to Frye then I would be pissed.
     
    Last edited: Jun 5, 2009
  12. Ed O

    Ed O Administrator Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    10,701
    Likes Received:
    2,826
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    Yes and yes!

    Ed O.
     
  13. RickyRubio

    RickyRubio He Hate Me

    Joined:
    May 27, 2009
    Messages:
    892
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Now that was uncalled for. :eek:


    :shitstorm:
     
  14. Pinwheel1

    Pinwheel1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    23,192
    Likes Received:
    15,646
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They are not technically resigning them. They would be picking up the option for the last year of their current contracts.
     
  15. hasoos

    hasoos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    9,418
    Likes Received:
    97
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I haven't actually paid attention to how often teams don't pick up the option for certain players. For bubble players, surely. But for rotation players, I would have to guess they get picked up most of the time.
     
  16. SteelBlaze1

    SteelBlaze1 Steeler/Blazer fan

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Messages:
    118
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    Oregon
    So these are for 1 year deals...got it...thank you.

    It does make sense then, to be able to have them so we can trade them.
     
  17. ant

    ant egg

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    591
    Likes Received:
    410
    Trophy Points:
    63
    This may just mean that KP has bigger plans to find players via trade rather than free-agency
     
  18. Boob-No-More

    Boob-No-More Why you no hire big man coach?

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2008
    Messages:
    19,094
    Likes Received:
    22,763
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Correct. Both are proven NBA players on very cheap contracts. Whether you plan to keep them, or trade them, you pick up their options. They are either cheap proven back-ups on your team, or valuable trade assets to bring you something of value in return. Given the state of the economy, the reduced salary cap and luxury tax threshold, and the fact that many teams are struggling financially, proven NBA players on cheap, short contracts could actually be pretty good trade assets. Re-signing both is a no brainer.

    BNM
     
  19. SteelBlaze1

    SteelBlaze1 Steeler/Blazer fan

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Messages:
    118
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    Oregon
    I have to ask...is this the Pinwheel1 from years ago on the Hoopsworld message boards?
     
  20. RickyRubio

    RickyRubio He Hate Me

    Joined:
    May 27, 2009
    Messages:
    892
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Boob owns you.
     

Share This Page