Zombie Rush the Stimulus Package...don't read it, just pass it!

But the spending wasn't emergency spending.

Your house may be on fire, a real emergency, but it doesn't make sense to go charge up your credit cards buying a new car (not related to putting out the fire).

http://www.thecapitol.net/glossary/def.htm#Emergency_Spending

"Emergency" Spending:
Spending with the "emergency" designation does not count against budget caps. While often used for one-time, unforeseen events, this designation has also been used to circumvent budget limits. For example, spending for the census has been designated as "emergency" spending. (Source: CQ Today)

http://www.eyeonthestatehouse.org/2008/03/13/curbing-emergency-spending/

As part of the debate over the Congressional budget resolution, Ohio Senator George Voinovich introduced an amendment to curb “emergency” spending. Trying to eliminate the abuse of this type of spending is long overdue.

The federal budget process is a complicated one. If Congress wants to spend money, it must comply with a variety of rules. However, there are a variety of loopholes that make federal spending easier. One of the most abused is “emergency” appropriations. By labeling something “emergency” spending, Congress can bypass ordinary rules and essentially spend money “off budget.”
Senator Voinovich’s office put it in this way:

If spending is designated as “emergency,” it is exempted from budget controls and spending limits. An example of the sort of emergency spending that concerns Sen. Voinovich is the designation of funding for the 2000 Census as emergency, even though the U.S. Constitution has required a census every 10 years since 1790.
​

Congressman Ron Paul describes it in these terms:

Congress funds the federal government through 13 enormous appropriations bills, but even an annual budget of more than $2 trillion is not enough to satisfy Washington’s appetite for new spending. As a result, a new category of spending bill has emerged, known as the “emergency supplemental” appropriation.

There’s no real emergency, however; Congress simply needs a 14th spending bill as a grab bag filled with hundreds of pages of goodies for countless favored groups, industries, individual companies, and foreign governments. It’s common for dozens of amendments to be added to the supplemental bill, all with more money for somebody.

So-called emergency supplemental spending bills, once a rarity, have become the norm over the last ten years in Washington. There’s always some excuse why Congress cannot stick to its budget, so supplemental bills are passed to permit spending extra “off-budget” funds. “Emergency” spending now has become routine, planned spending.
​

Finding a way to curb this abuse of the budget process is an imortant step in restoring fiscal discipline.

 

Ok, whatever. This seems pretty much unrelated to the topic at hand. If the census - the single most predictable spending item there could possibly be - is funded via emergency funding, then whether or not the stimulus is funded by emergency funding is pretty much irrelevant.

I don't see that it really makes any difference. The spending caps that Congress exceeds with emergency funding are caps they set themselves, so putting it into the regular budget is only going to change the label.

barfo

 

Two wrongs don't make a right. In this case, the 2nd wrong is a disaster.

Speaking of disasters, Katrina/New Orleans is worthy of the emergency designation. Funding a war effort is worthy of the designation.

Funding "shovel ready" projects for the next election year that have nothing to do with stimulating an economy in "crisis" is beyond folly.

 

Unfortunately, Obama's taken a smoldering fire and poured trillions of $dollars on it to turn it into an out of control raging fire.

 

Arguing with ghosts