Seems like a wasted pick to me. Why pick a player whos skills are hard to judge based on who the competition has been and jettison 2 of our SF's over it. If we're going to gamble, let's do so at least in response to a genuine need like back up PF pr PG.
Copying and pasting a chunk is OK. A long passage is less OK, especially if it's from a pay site (like ESPN Insider). I think, personally, that it makes most sense to paste a sentence or two and a link. That way this site is covered and people get a flavor of what the article is about. Ed O.
we wouldn't grab him for us, it would be for someone who is in the 24+ range that didnt want to lose him to sac... someone who will be trading us a vet 1 or 4 off their roster to us
I love the part about the Blazers, but what's with this Earl Clark guy? The article says he could go in the top 13, but I haven't even seen him mentioned in any mock drafts.
Earl Clark is kind of flying under the radar in most mocks, but he is a pretty good player. He has a lot of tools. He isn't talked about much because of the other 2 high profile players from the same team.