What we want in a Free Agent

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by Rastapopoulos, Jul 4, 2009.

  1. Rastapopoulos

    Rastapopoulos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    41,775
    Likes Received:
    26,114
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Ballin'
    Dimitris Diamantidis

    I now have a serious mancrush:

    [video=youtube;seA_wEZdX50]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=seA_wEZdX50[/video]

    Also:

    He's under contract for the next season (at a hefty 2.1M Euros) but Spanoulis, who played in 2006 for the Rockets, got out of a contract with the same club to do it. However, it might be because he had built-in opt-outs in his contract. Also Diamantidis has claimed never to be interested in the NBA. But I really wish/hope the Blazers would give it a try.
     
    Last edited: Jul 5, 2009
  2. Ed O

    Ed O Administrator Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    10,701
    Likes Received:
    2,826
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    It would be a very nice pair of additions, IMO.

    But I would think that, wouldn't I? :)

    Ed O.
     
  3. mook

    mook The 2018-19 season was the best I've seen

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    8,309
    Likes Received:
    3,944
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Buy a recipe binder at CookbookPeople.com
    Location:
    Jolly Olde England
    Either individually would be a nice addition. I'd like three point shooting out of more than one position in our starting lineup though, so I'd rather not get both.

    I'd be happy with, say, Marion and Hinrich or Kidd. If we get Andre Miller, I'd prefer we just keep the Batum/Outlaw/Webster lineup, as I can't think of any really good SF's who might be available who can hit a three pointer.
     
  4. glazeduck

    glazeduck Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2009
    Messages:
    1,107
    Likes Received:
    1,172
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think it's important to not JUST look at players on paper to decide who would/wouldn't be good for us.

    Case in point: on paper/face value, Turk was perhaps an above-average 30 year old riding a very solid playoffs. But when you start to talk about how he would've meshed with this team, it's obvious that he would've been a nice addition.

    So who else can we say that about?

    I think, on paper Sessions looks better than Felton, however, how would they play w/ the rest of our squad? Felton is a better defender, which will help GO and LA stay out of foul trouble. Sessions is the better ball handler/distributor, but Felton, while not as good, certainly has those skills as well, and is a much better shooter from distance, especially in catch and shoot scenarios.

    I think, next to BRoy, Felton would be a pretty solid "pg", but would need a sf that is a playmaker.

    As for SF, if we can't get Prince, I honestly think it's time to let TO do what he can to boost his value as much as possible, and take the best deal at the deadline for an established SF.

    I was thinking about it this morning... IT's really too bad that Stephen Jackson is such a nutcase... He's the exact SF we need.
     
  5. Pinwheel1

    Pinwheel1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    23,193
    Likes Received:
    15,648
    Trophy Points:
    113
     

Share This Page