Of course they do. Bulls are getting the best player in the deal, and they want more? Fuck off, Paxson.
I'm not a huge Bayless fan - I don't think he's a PG. But the Bulls can go fuck themselves with that one.
hmmm... I don't think I would want to give up on him for Hinrich. So that would leave us with Blake and Kirk for PG? I like that. But I like Kirk\Bayless better!
A Bayless-Rose backcourt would be nasty. Don't do it KP! C'mon bitchy Utah... just take Tim Thomas rather than Tyrus.
Maybe people will understand that the reason deals aren't getting done is because KP can't find a good one. Give up Bayless? Yeah right.
Other teams seem to find deals that work OK. Giving up Bayless and our cap space for Hinrich would be outrageous and I'd be upset over it. Hopefully KP does not even consider it. Ed O.
Orlando was able to get Vince for scraps and expirings. Orlando signed Bass for a cheap contract. Spurs got RJ for expirings. Don't tell me we couldn't have gotten any of those.
Orlando gave up Courtney Lee and Alston. Bass is no big deal. The Blazers looked at RJ at the trade deadline. Obviously something they didn't like in that deal.
You can view it as getting Carter for scraps. But Orlando was pretty high on Courtney Lee, in a similar fashion to us with Batum. And many in here would not view trading Batum for Carter as just giving up scraps to get him. So that's not the case. Sure, we can get in on that, by giving up Batum. Similar in this deal, giving up Bayless.
Just like New Jersey was pretty high on Ryan Anderson, and he ended up in the trade with Vince Carter.