Perhaps an explanation of why we were never serious for Sessions

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by SodaPopinski, Jul 24, 2009.

  1. SodaPopinski

    SodaPopinski Tigers love pepper

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    1,856
    Likes Received:
    50
    Trophy Points:
    48
    So, the little-talked-about nugget around the NBA is the worry that the league is going to drastically alter the collective bargaining agreement when it expires at the end of the 2011 season. This could mean a hard salary cap or other new measures that will drastically affect a team's flexibility if they are tied into several long-term deals.

    It's been pretty public that Sessions is looking for a long-term deal. The Blazers are apparently signing Andre Miller for two years, with the third year being a team option. So, guess where we are at the end of the second year of Andre's contract? At the end of the 2010-2011 season, when -- you said it -- the current collective bargaining agreement expires. That gives us another way to vacate our salary commitments in the hopes that we'll maintain some flexibility if they implement a hard cap or other new regulations on what teams and players can do.

    So - back to Sessions. With a long-term deal (he's probably looking for a five or six year deal), he'd be locked up through the next CBA negotiations, somewhat hamstringing whatever team he was on.

    Now, obviously, we will have certain players on the team who this theory won't apply to -- Roy, Aldridge, Oden, etc. But I wonder if we are trying to lessen our commitments past that 2011 season. :dunno:

    It seems reasonable, but then again it doesn't explain why we offered Turkoglu a five-year deal and Millsap a four-year deal. I could be all washed up on this theory and the Blazers truly didn't think Sessions was a good fit.
     
    Last edited: Jul 24, 2009
  2. Ed O

    Ed O Administrator Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    10,701
    Likes Received:
    2,826
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    I agree totally that the impending CBA change is a big consideration, but I don't think that the Blazers would have let that stop them if they liked Sessions as much as some of us on this board do.

    The most he could get is a five year deal and he'd be relatively cheap up front... and having your starting PG locked in for five years would not be a bad thing, IMO.

    I think it's an interesting angle, but I really think it comes down to how they saw Sessions fitting in (or not).

    Ed O.
     
  3. Foulzilla

    Foulzilla No Blood, No Foul.

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    305
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    18
    It's an interesting thought. But as you said, they didn't mind giving that to Hedo. I suspect KP & Co just didn't like Sessions as much as many on the board do. It's also possible they are convinced Milwaukee is matching whatever is offered, and view it as a lost cause.
     
  4. Minstrel

    Minstrel Top Of The Pops Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    26,226
    Likes Received:
    14,407
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    User Interface Designer
    Location:
    Hello darkness, my old friend
    Yeah, I think that they ultimately felt Sessions wasn't a good fit. Disappointing to me, but Miller is at least as good in the short-term and in the long-term...well, we all die in the long-term.
     
  5. LittleAlex

    LittleAlex Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    2,824
    Likes Received:
    54
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I think Portland didn't want to wait another 7 days and be denied another time. Miller was a sure thing, so they took it.

    Also, Nate wanted a vet. Sessions is a lot of things, but veteran is not one of them.
     
  6. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,096
    Likes Received:
    9,073
    Trophy Points:
    113
    CapSpace '11!
     

Share This Page