I'm reading it as you are saying this, at least in the way you are applying "my logic" to your Blake argument. Again, maybe Blake's postseason failures are a result of him working too hard in the offseason. Maybe he should sit on his ass like Miller. I don't know that answer to that one either. You keep supplying my opinion for me; unfortunately, it isn't even close to my opinion.
Your opinion seemed to be, and correct me if I'm worng, because I don't know if you're giving an opinion, or just pointing stuff out for us, but you're opinion seems to be that Miller should be working out with the team. Yes? No? Now, your backing for this opinion, or part of the reasoning, was that what he has been doing has not resulted in success in the playoffs. Correct?
I understand he could do what he wants. Thanks for pointing that out. We're not discussing what he can and can't do. Do you have an opinion on the topic? Or did you just come to post what each was doing with their respective times this summer?
PapaG, can't you use the same logic with Blake then? Blake has won the same number of playoffs as Miller so maybe he needs to be the one to change his approach. Just asking?
Yeah, I said that already. The new approach to improving your game...do nothing. Seems illogical in athletics, but in a vacuum, it makes sense.
Rasheed Wallace is one of the laziest players in the league. He's won a championship. We CAN do this all day. What does it mean? It means nothing. A championship is won or lost by a team of 12 or more individuals. Kobe Bryant busts his ass in the offseason, but he hadn't won a championship without shaq until last season. This isn't as simple as A+B=C
I never said it was simple. As I said, Miller can do whatever he wants. I'll comment on his results as I see fit.
No, I'm wondering what my opinion is on this, as he sees it. I don't really have one, at least not one I'm passionate about enough to hold a negative view on Miller. If the supposed argument is purely logical, let's discuss the parameters instead of assuming all parts are equal.
In the off-season, players need to strike a balance between getting in shape and letting the injuries (and simple wear-and-tear) of the prior season heal. That balance will be different for each player. It will be several months before we can see who did/didn't get it right. On a different subject....... Turkyglue just landed a very nice contract, based not on his own merits, but on the reflected glory from Orlando's run to the finals. Many of us have questioned whether the Raps made a good decision, and felt the Blazers dodged a bullet. Miller is the opposite side of that coin. Playing on bad teams has tarnished his reputation....and some of us don't think *that* is right either.
Sorry, should have said you were using flawed logic to enhance or support statements made about Miller. Making the assumption that it was his offseason work that caused his playoff losses, which would imply a correlation between offseason work and playoff team performance.
I never made that assumption. In fact, I was clear to point out that there was only a correlation between the lack of work in the offseason and the lack of postseason success. Mook even posed the question "correlation or causation". I answer neither for his "Powerball" analogy, and correlation for the actual topic being discussed. This is our disconnect. You are attributing to me a position that I simply do not hold.
But Miller HAS had postseason success. He played very well in the playoffs last season. That's your correlation. Work hard in the offseason, play well in the playoffs. What else is he supposed to do? He can only play his best. Nobody has ever said that Miller is LeBron or Jordan. He can't will a team to victory. Logging a couple extra hours in the gym during the summer isn't going to change his teammates. Go look at his stats and tell me he didn't perform well in the playoffs.
And how do you prove the correlation between lack of team success to Miller's actions during the offseason? Is it really as simple for you that because he has not done one, and not achieved another, there is a relationship between the two? That there are no other factors involved?