House Admonishes Wilson

Discussion in 'Blazers OT Forum' started by BLAZER PROPHET, Sep 15, 2009.

  1. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.articlei.html

    Article I, Section 5

    Each House may determine the rules of its proceedings, punish its members for disorderly behavior, and, with the concurrence of two thirds, expel a member.

    Article I, Section 6

    They shall in all cases, except treason, felony and breach of the peace, be privileged from arrest during their attendance at the session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same; and for any speech or debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other place.
     
  2. PapaG

    PapaG Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    32,870
    Likes Received:
    291
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Tualatin, OR
    Well, the speech was a joint session, wasn't it? The House was actually in session, although similar comments (Pete Stark comes immediately to mind) were made about Bush while the House was in session.
     
  3. maxiep

    maxiep RIP Dr. Jack

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,303
    Likes Received:
    5,884
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Merchant Banker
    Location:
    Denver, CO & Lake Oswego, OR
    Agreed. It made the Republicans look petty and desperate. When you're confident of your policy prescriptions, you shouldn't need to resort to tactics like the Republicans did back in the late 90s.
     
  4. maxiep

    maxiep RIP Dr. Jack

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,303
    Likes Received:
    5,884
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Merchant Banker
    Location:
    Denver, CO & Lake Oswego, OR
    Why do you refuse to see the obvious loophole? It exists. I know what the language says, but without enforcability, you can't uphold that part of the law. That's why the Democrats rejected the amendments that would have closed those loopholes.
     
  5. RoyIsClutch07

    RoyIsClutch07 Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2009
    Messages:
    1,116
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
  6. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    I am quite sure the house has the power to punish Wilson. It's obviously a partisan vote only possible because they have enough to pass it.

    Though there were many times Ted Kennedy said things about people while on the senate floor that would have gotten his ass sued for libel, but was protected by Article I, Section 6:

    and for any speech or debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other place.

     
  7. MARIS61

    MARIS61 Real American

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,007
    Likes Received:
    5,012
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired Yankee
    Location:
    Beautiful Central Oregon
    Main Entry: ad·mon·ish
    Pronunciation: \ad-ˈmä-nish\
    Function: transitive verb
    Etymology: Middle English admonesten, from Anglo-French amonester, from Vulgar Latin *admonestare, alteration of Latin admonēre to warn, from ad- + monēre to warn — more at mind
    Date: 14th century
    1 a : to indicate duties or obligations to b : to express warning or disapproval to especially in a gentle, earnest, or solicitous manner
    2 : to give friendly earnest advice or encouragement to


    Seems politely appropriate, why the outrage?
     

Share This Page