nice topic. I've always had a problem with Baron Davis' demeanor on and off the court. He never listens to the coaches, he gets in fights with teammates and the staff, and he take alot of ill-advised shots on the court. Almost for that solely i would take Bibby. But Bibby is really an All Star PG (i don't know how he continually gets passed up. Tony Parker had one good year and mad the ASG, Mike's been doing that for years..). He is a pretty good leader, and he can score along with creating for his teammates.
Yah, but id BD was healthy...I would still choose Mike. On the good Sacto teams from a couple years ago, he averaged 8 dimes a game, but now he looks for his shot more (not first.) And Mike is one of the top 5 clutch players in the league. BD is more showy though, and he is a much better defender.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Venom_7 @ Apr 16 2006, 06:26 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Yah, but id BD was healthy...I would still choose Mike. On the good Sacto teams from a couple years ago, he averaged 8 dimes a game, but now he looks for his shot more (not first.) And Mike is one of the top 5 clutch players in the league. BD is more showy though, and he is a much better defender.</div>I gotta disagree with you on him being on of the top 5 clutch players in the league. That is way off. He has hit like 2 clutch shots in his whole career. And now, he definenetly looks to shoot first. Why do you think he's averaging 21 a game. And a couple years ago in Sacramento's glory days he averaged around 15 ppg. He fits the SG position more now to me, height aside. But still he's better then Baron Davis.
i always loved mike bibby. he's such a great player. he's a much better shooter than davis who likes to take 3's and can't hit. bibby takes them and makes them. bibby also doesn't get hurt all the time like davis.
I take bibby. Even if Baron was 100% . Bibby is a great clutch player. I like bibbys game. Baron is just a show off type player
Mike Bibby was much better playing along Vlade and Webber but he still is effective and having a good year this year. He struggles a little bit with running an offense and I feel is better off the ball like Terry. I'd still take him over Baron Davis because Baron is selfish and a low percentage shooter. Especially from 3.
i'd take mike bibby, they both good, but at least bibby isn't always in a suit and tie on the bench, so that's the reason i'd take bibby over davis
I'd take mini-me. He's a very versatile point. Look at what he did in Vancouver. He lacks in D and doesn't have Baron's power. But atleast he doesn't have Baron's back and boneheaded-ness.What's Davis shooting from the 3? Like 25%? And he still shoots them...
Bibby. He is an excellent offensive player. Great shooter, good in clutch situations and he has good good pg skills and he makes nice passes. BDiddy is just all show off to me. He just wants to get on the high-right reel. Nothing really impresses me about him. I dont like 'em.
