Future Starting 5

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by magnifier661, Oct 8, 2009.

  1. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    And I know a ton will totally disagree with me, but here it goes. Now keep in mind, this is only if all the players stay.

    PG: Miller, SG: Fernandez, SF: Roy, PF: Aldridge, Center: Oden

    Blake: PG/SG Sub
    Webster: SG/SF sub
    Batum: SF Sub
    Outlaw: SF/PF Sub
    Pryzbilla: Center Sub

    Variables: Bayless (SG/PG) and Howard (vet big man)

    The rotations will be sweet and very versatile. First sub would be moving Roy to SG, and subbing Batum for Fernandez. Then sub Roy for Webs and Miller with Blake. yada yada yada.

    The only reason why I suspect this may be a possibility is well... I think Fernandez's ego wants him to eventually be a starter.
     
  2. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    125,318
    Likes Received:
    145,526
    Trophy Points:
    115
    Not starting but we will be finishing a lot of games with that lineup this year. A lot of nice weapons and options in late game situations.
     
  3. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    Oh not for this year. I am just thinking about the future. It could be possible for Fernandez to want to stay knowing he is finishing games. I'm just worried about his ego and used to being the star of his team.
     
  4. Nikolokolus

    Nikolokolus There's always next year

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    30,704
    Likes Received:
    6,198
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm not worried about his ego, if he bitches and demands more, package his ass up with somebody else and trade him. Rudy is not indispensable.
     
  5. glazeduck

    glazeduck Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2009
    Messages:
    1,107
    Likes Received:
    1,172
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Several problems with this "future" you speak of...

    In the "future" Andre Miller won't be a Blazer. I'll be shocked if he's one next year, let alone in the more distant future. Bayless, Outlaw, possibly Blake, and whatever else it takes WILL be moved at the deadline to get our franchise pg of the future.

    Also, how the hell is Juwan Howard a variable? Forget the fact that we have the best young 4/5 combo in the league, Juwan Howard is ANCIENT. He won't play a factor in the present, let alone the future. He's a glorified coach already.

    Finally, barring a huge blowup or bad injury with Roy, Rudy won't be a starter in Portland, ever. Its sad because he's a great player and a fan favorite, but neither he nor Brandon have what it takes to move positions and still play at the level we'd need them to play at, plus we're too loaded at the 3 and will eventually have a "the guy" at pg. Either Rudy will have to be ok with a career of being a backup, or he'll get shipped out eventually.

    Like others have said, your lineup could very well be one which we finish games with THIS season. But you might wanna get some windex on that crystal ball of yours. That or return it for a working one.
     
  6. Foulzilla

    Foulzilla No Blood, No Foul.

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    305
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    18
    I know some people will say moving Roy to a sub-optimal position is a bad idea, regardless of Rudy's talent. However, Roy has shown to be very effective as a SF.

    http://www.82games.com/0809/08POR5.HTM

    This site shows by position stats. You'll notice that he spent roughly 25% of the teams minutes as a SF last year (vs roughly 50% of the teams time at SG), and he put up a higher PER as a SF than a SG (though marginally). However, look at his opponents PER. It's a massive difference (17.1 vs 8.8). This would imply he's actually much better at defending SFs. Though I suspect most of his SF minutes were against backups, not starters, which would skew the results. However, it does seem to imply he could be very effective as a SF. I do think it might be worth at least experimenting with. Roy could still handle the ball plenty at SF.

    Note: I would avoid reading anything into his PG or PF stats, as both were such limited minutes as to round to 0%, though the PG numbers are fairly amusing.

    Of course, I'm not totally convinced that, long term, Rudy is going to remain a better fit than Batum (nothing against Rudy, I'm just really high on Batum and think we really need a great defender in the starting lineup). But it's interesting to consider.
     
  7. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    125,318
    Likes Received:
    145,526
    Trophy Points:
    115
    Rudy would have to know by now if he could be a starting sg in the NBA. He plays against a 2x all star every day in practice.
     
  8. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    Um, I use (variables) since well, I doubt they are even a factor. And all the names I use are because they are the players we have now. You could very easily add "vet PG" in place of Miller. :D As for Roy not being able to play the 3... I completely disagree with you there. In fact, the games I've seen him play the 3, he did very well.
     
  9. Fez Hammersticks

    Fez Hammersticks スーパーバッド Zero Cool

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    29,160
    Likes Received:
    9,840
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Phone Psychic
    Location:
    The Deep State, US and A.
    Down the road I can see KP packaging Rudy with a few other assets to land us a good young-vet PG.
     
  10. BenDavis503

    BenDavis503 Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2009
    Messages:
    2,224
    Likes Received:
    23
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Computer Geek
    Location:
    503
    You have Miller and Howard on our team for the "future" lineup? So how far exactly are you looking in the future? 1 year?
     
  11. maxiep

    maxiep RIP Dr. Jack

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,303
    Likes Received:
    5,884
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Merchant Banker
    Location:
    Denver, CO & Lake Oswego, OR
    Here's my future starting lineup: [​IMG]
     
  12. BoBoBREWSKI

    BoBoBREWSKI BURP!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    14,354
    Likes Received:
    5,853
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    NW
    Blake
    Roy
    Webster
    Aldridge
    Oden
     
  13. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,325
    Likes Received:
    43,687
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Koponnen, Roy, Claver, Aldridge, Oden :lol:
     
  14. Minstrel

    Minstrel Top Of The Pops Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    26,226
    Likes Received:
    14,407
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    User Interface Designer
    Location:
    Hello darkness, my old friend
    Bayless, Roy, Batum, Aldridge, Oden

    Fernandez as the primary reserve and best sixth man in the league.

    Bayless hasn't yet proven that he'll be the starting guard of the future, but I think he will. If I'm wrong, Pritchard has a couple of years to find a good guard to pair with Roy, as Miller has at least a couple of years left in him, I think.
     
  15. Wizard Mentor

    Wizard Mentor Wizard Mentor

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2008
    Messages:
    14,625
    Likes Received:
    14,851
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Master of Xen Foro
    Location:
    La Grande, OR
    Roy has lost weight this year - he reportedly weighs 205 lbs. He won't be spending too much time at the "3". This is why Nate's trying to get Rudy more time at the 1.
     
  16. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    94,064
    Likes Received:
    57,214
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Lineup this season - Miller/Roy/Batum/Aldridge/Oden
    Lineup of the future - Bayless/Roy/Batum/Aldridge/Oden
     

Share This Page