Failing Chemistry

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by Nikolokolus, Oct 21, 2009.

  1. Nikolokolus

    Nikolokolus There's always next year

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    30,704
    Likes Received:
    6,198
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The Oregonian's Joe Freeman has an interesting take on the team's performance tonight:
    http://blog.oregonlive.com/behindblazersbeat/2009/10/portland_97_utah_108_blazers_g.html

    Maybe this is why so many of us felt like beating our heads against a wall when KP failed to do any kind of consolidation trade -- a team chock full of young guns looking to score their first extension and 12-13 of them likely rotation quality at a minimum and are we really supposed to be surprised that a team with too many chiefs and not enough indians is having trouble finding its way when no roles (aside from Roy) are really defined for this squad?

    Not trying to be alarmist, but boy oh boy does this thing feel like it's teetering on a knife's edge -- this team just has that feeling that it is either going to be a disaster or a fucking masterpiece, without a whole lot of middle ground.

    drink 'em if you got 'em, it's going to be an interesting ride.
     
    Last edited: Oct 21, 2009
  2. rocketeer

    rocketeer Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2003
    Messages:
    3,250
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    38
    preseason.
     
  3. Nikolokolus

    Nikolokolus There's always next year

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    30,704
    Likes Received:
    6,198
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I agree ... to a point, there just doesn't seem to be much flow with this team right now and tonight's game was reportedly treated like a regular season game (at least by Nate). But this team's struggles really aren't even about tonight, there's just something about this team that makes it feel like a football team with nothing but quarterbacks, wide recievers and running backs on the roster and not enough nose tackles, centers and fullbacks.
     
  4. Schilly

    Schilly Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2009
    Messages:
    3,161
    Likes Received:
    3,345
    Trophy Points:
    113
    preseason nothing, this team is way way too deep. The problem it creates is it muddles roles too much. After watching them play tonight and having followed all the other games I have no clue how to possibly divvy up the minutes. 3 guys tonight became clear to me as guys that need to be playing, Cunningham, Bayless and Howard. The problem is where do you play them and at what expense of PT to who? In my mind Howard has to be our backup PF. He plays so smart and he absolutely is a big time leader on the floor. He literally is like a coach on the floor. Cunningham probably is #12 on the bench but man he is way too good for that, he should be getting PT every single night, same with Bayless.

    This team in all honesty is far too deep. I don't know what I would trade for, but I do know we should do something, if nothing else the depth is adding to McMillans indecisiveness.
     
  5. rocketeer

    rocketeer Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2003
    Messages:
    3,250
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    38
    nate can say that all he wants but collins, cunningham, udoka, howard, and bayless playing significant minutes says otherwise.

    really, the blazers just have one too many guys in the rotation. someone is going to get left out at the small forward position. either that or all three guys will be unhappy. i'd expect that someone will initially get left out(maybe outlaw just getting the backup 4 minutes and that's it) but that over the course of the season injuries and their play will be able to sort things out.

    oh and bayless won't be happy being on the bench even more than he was last season but that's what the blazers committed to by bringing in miller but at this point i'm not seeing why that matters.
     
  6. Schilly

    Schilly Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2009
    Messages:
    3,161
    Likes Received:
    3,345
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yeah this team is terribly out of sync. Even our starting unit from last year. I don't want to rag on the guy casue I don't want to be accused of Trolling, but Blake literally has been one of if not our worst player in preseason, the others being Outlaw and Collins.
     
  7. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,096
    Likes Received:
    9,073
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Kind of easy for me. Bayless gets PT at the expense of Blake, Howard at the expense of Outlaw, and DC/Webster/Batum get to fight it out. Hot hand+heady play+tough D each night gets you minutes. Complacency does not.
     
  8. rocketeer

    rocketeer Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2003
    Messages:
    3,250
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    38
    you're crazy if you think juwan howard has earned any kind of minutes for a playoff team at this stage in his career.

    cunningham is a 2nd round pick. no reason to pencil him into any minutes at all, especially not based on preseason.

    with bayless, he should have been playing last year over sergio and he should be playing this year as well. but he won't be, and really i don't see how it's a huge deal.
     
  9. MIXUM

    MIXUM Suspended

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    5,983
    Likes Received:
    44
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    radio/mixmaster/club jock/syndication programmer
    Location:
    lurking in the shadows
    blazers will be the titans of the nba. major expectaions = a major letdown.

    im just hoping playoffs at this point. we suck.

    nate should just go ... miller, roy, webster, la, oden with rudy, batum, howard, and pryz off bench. let miller or roy always play pg.
     
  10. Minstrel

    Minstrel Top Of The Pops Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    26,226
    Likes Received:
    14,407
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    User Interface Designer
    Location:
    Hello darkness, my old friend
    Different year, same tune. This line from MIXUM basically means a new season is about to start! I'm not sure an NBA season is allowed to kick off before MIXUM says this.

    If and when the Blazers win a championship, MIXUM will lead off the next year with, "sure this team won a title but theyre playing preseason like a bunch of complacent losers. theyre about to lose the respect of the nba as a fluke. im just hoping playoffs at this point. we suck."
     
  11. Schilly

    Schilly Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2009
    Messages:
    3,161
    Likes Received:
    3,345
    Trophy Points:
    113
    When I say they should be playing it means that they are good enough to play on a regular basis, but they are buried on the depth chart.

    How do you suppose Howard hasn't justified playing 10mpg as a backup? Becasue of his age? You can't say a guy doesn't deserve minutes because he was a 2nd round pick, that's irrelevant where he is picked and what he does are 2 different things. And it seems we agree on Bayless. If Preseason doesn't mean anything to the coaches and determining PT and who plays well together, then why have it at all? So players can not prove to you their capacity to play the game?
     
  12. rocketeer

    rocketeer Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2003
    Messages:
    3,250
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    38
    howard doesn't deserve minutes because he hasn't been effective for years. the blazers(and every team in the league) have guys better than him so that he should ideally never see the floor.

    as far as cunningham, being a 2nd round pick doesn't disqualify him from playing but nothing he could do in the preseason can prove that he needs to be on the floor.

    preseason just gets you ready for the season. it gives teams an opportunity to get players familiar with playing with each other in actual game situations and gives coaches an opportunity to try a lot of things out without it counting against them(unless you have a fanbase that is going to pretend it's meaningful, i guess). there is a reason that the win loss record is completely forgotten and doesn't count towards anything. it's meaningless.
     
  13. Schilly

    Schilly Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2009
    Messages:
    3,161
    Likes Received:
    3,345
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You're crazy for believing that Coaches don't use preseason to evaluate a players ability in game time situations. Can a player hit an open shot? What are their instincts? Do they have a knack for getting rebounds? You learn more about players by watching them in games...yes even preseason games, than you do from practicing.

    And your opinion on Juwan Howard... Time will tell, but he has played pretty dang well. Disregard preseason altogether...puhhhlease.
     
  14. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    93,984
    Likes Received:
    57,121
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    You're jaded about Howard because of his time with the Rockets. He has played well with the Blazers.
     
  15. Schilly

    Schilly Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2009
    Messages:
    3,161
    Likes Received:
    3,345
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Doesn't matter new players can't earn PT in preseason, it apparently doesn't count.
     
  16. rocketeer

    rocketeer Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2003
    Messages:
    3,250
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    38
    "preseason just gets you ready for the season. it gives teams an opportunity to get players familiar with playing with each other in actual game situations and gives coaches an opportunity to try a lot of things out without it counting against them."

    time has already told that juwan howard sucks.
     
  17. rocketeer

    rocketeer Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2003
    Messages:
    3,250
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    38
    if he was bad on the rockets 5 seasons ago, bad on the mavs 2 seasons ago, bad on denver last season, and bad on charlotte last season what leads you to believe that something will change in portland?

    i mean if they were getting even the juwan howard from houston that would be fine as a 10 minute a game big(though i still wouldn't play him over outlaw) but they're getting a juwan howard even worse than that.
     
  18. Schilly

    Schilly Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2009
    Messages:
    3,161
    Likes Received:
    3,345
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I have to be honest I didn't expect anything of Howard this year. But he is playing well, and he is the guy that Nate has gone to to start when Lamarcus has taken nights off. He is still fully capable of playing the backup minutes behind Lamarcus. Is he a stud starter? No not anymore, but he is a smart player and seems to be working well in Nates system.
     
  19. Nikolokolus

    Nikolokolus There's always next year

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    30,704
    Likes Received:
    6,198
    Trophy Points:
    113
  20. VanillaGorilla

    VanillaGorilla Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2009
    Messages:
    12,073
    Likes Received:
    4,750
    Trophy Points:
    113
    LEAVE MY TITANS ALONE!
     

Share This Page