Dante Cunningham: Diamond in the rough? (MERGED)

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by Shooter, Oct 20, 2009.

  1. hasoos

    hasoos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    9,418
    Likes Received:
    97
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I don't agree, because a Tweener is not good at either position they play. A versatile player is good at all the positions they play. You are labelling him a tweener because of his size, alone, when it is truly the talent they bring to the position that determines if they are a tweener or a versatile player. Let him get some run before labelling him one or the other.
     
  2. Shooter

    Shooter Unanimously Great

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2008
    Messages:
    5,484
    Likes Received:
    152
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    advertising
    Location:
    Blazerville
    Re: DANTE: Our best SF?

    Very good points. I'm a little tired of waiting for Webster and Outlaw and Batum to "develop," especially when you see a guy like Cunnigham playing this well in his rookie pre-season. It seems like an eternity since we drafted Webster, and yet the guy is still just as inconsistent from the field as ever.

    Give me some guys that can PLAY. I'm tired of hearing about "potential."
     
  3. BenDavis503

    BenDavis503 Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2009
    Messages:
    2,224
    Likes Received:
    23
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Computer Geek
    Location:
    503
    True. I had a couple beers in me when I thought that idea lol

    I like it a lot but they wouldn't do it. Maybe if we throw Bayless at them and they throw back Collison.
     
  4. crandc

    crandc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    22,668
    Likes Received:
    29,377
    Trophy Points:
    113
    When I saw him in Sacramento he looked awful. Either that was just a bad game or he's an incredibly fast learner.
     

Share This Page