Hawks, because they have the younger team, simple as that. The Knicks need to rebuild their team around Frye, Curry, and Robinson, they have horrible team chemistry the worst I've seen in years
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (kingjamez @ May 14 2006, 10:33 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>This thread is old. and nykfan was owned by my first post. So it's over</div> :thumbdn1: not really. everyone on this forum hates the knicks so they would never admit they have any kind of potential.<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (iversonfan268 @ May 14 2006, 10:18 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>How can it be the Kniicks??? The Hawks have a lot of young talent and a veteran leader in Johnson. The Knicks team has the worst chemistry out of any team in the league. I mean why would you put 2 shoot first point guards on the same team??? The Knicks have a lot of talent, just not players that mix well w/ each other. It easily is the Hawks. They have the potential to be a pretty good team in the future.</div>first of all i never mentioned anything about francis and marbury. this is not what the thread is about. try reading what i wrote.<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (DaCaliHustla50 @ May 14 2006, 10:28 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>The Knicks need to rebuild their team around Frye, Curry, and Robinson, they have horrible team chemistry the worst I've seen in years</div>yea those are the young guys i'm talking about and lee and butler. without marbury and francis there would be no chemistry problems.
