Put Pritchard on blast

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by Fez Hammersticks, Nov 5, 2009.

  1. andalusian

    andalusian Season - Restarted

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    15,018
    Likes Received:
    14,244
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    San Marcos, CA
    Harris, at least in his Dallas days, was a great defender. That's where he is a better fit than Andre.

    Parker - I think, is a much better scorer than Andre - but I might be wrong.
     
  2. axs88

    axs88 Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    651
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    28
    OK, that may be true, but who exactly are all these free agents he missed out on while waiting that would have been better fits? I can only think of Odom, and he was not seriously considering leaving LA. David Lee was concerned about PT. Sessions he still could have had if he wanted him. You're saying he missed out on Brandon Bass/McDyess etc.? I don't think backup 4 was our biggest priority unless that meant getting BPA or a blue chipper to form a future 3-man rotation up front (Millsap, Lee).
     
  3. RR7

    RR7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    18,373
    Likes Received:
    12,500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    D seemed to be a throw in at the end of his paragraph on Parker's fit, and most of the discussion of fit with our PG tends to the offensive side of the ball. Look, I would obviously pefer Parker to Miller, as well as Harris. But I'm not getting where either has a much different style to their game than Miller does, where they are deemed in the good fit category, and Miller is included in worst possible fit.

    Sure Parker is a better scorer. He also has a usage rate equal to Brandon Roy's. So now, people will complain that Miller is ball dominant, and thus doesn't fit with Roy, but that all of a sudden doesn't apply to Parker? If the worry is a ball dominant guard alongside Roy, than parker is a much worse fit.

    Devin Harris' usage was on par with Roy's as well. So let's give Miller the same usage, and tell me his numbers won't look every bit as good as theirs do. Because statistically, and stylistically, he is on par.

    Again, I would take them both over him, but completely opposite styles somehow, in regards to fit? No.
     
  4. jlprk

    jlprk The ESPN mod is insane.

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2009
    Messages:
    30,672
    Likes Received:
    8,852
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired, while you work!
    There were a few others. I was highest on Odom because 1) he could fill 2 needs (SF, backup PF) instead of acquiring 2 separate players, and because 2) we would be severely injuring our rival, the Lakers, instead of the Jazz (Milsap), who won't really threaten us in the standings. There were other players taken by other teams while Pritchard had to wait on his offers.
     
  5. andalusian

    andalusian Season - Restarted

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    15,018
    Likes Received:
    14,244
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    San Marcos, CA
    That's why I said I was not sure about Parker.

    I do not think his usage was that high in Dallas - that's why I mentioned his Dallas performance. I agree with you that I do not think play D-Harris as he does in NJ next to Roy is going to work great.
     
  6. axs88

    axs88 Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    651
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Care to name them? My point is, this wasn't a good year for FAs, I guess he should have used the cap space in a trade instead, but he certainly didn't miss out on anyone siginificant while waiting on Hedo/Millsap.

    I really liked Odom as well, we reportedly pursued him but he wasn't interested.
     
  7. RR7

    RR7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    18,373
    Likes Received:
    12,500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Right, his usage wasn't that high, but stylistically, he was the same player he is now. Good finisher, can get to the basket. Not that good of a shooter. It's part of why I don't understand why peopel clamor for him, but say that Bayless can't fit here.
     
  8. Fez Hammersticks

    Fez Hammersticks スーパーバッド Zero Cool

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    28,941
    Likes Received:
    9,597
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Phone Psychic
    Location:
    The Deep State, US and A.
    [​IMG]
     
  9. VanillaGorilla

    VanillaGorilla Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2009
    Messages:
    12,073
    Likes Received:
    4,750
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Eric Gordon = OJ Mayo

    :dunno:
     
  10. Fez Hammersticks

    Fez Hammersticks スーパーバッド Zero Cool

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    28,941
    Likes Received:
    9,597
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Phone Psychic
    Location:
    The Deep State, US and A.
    Gordon is Bayless if Bayless could shoot. Scoring, defense, shooting. He'd be perfect next to Roy.
     
  11. VanillaGorilla

    VanillaGorilla Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2009
    Messages:
    12,073
    Likes Received:
    4,750
    Trophy Points:
    113

Share This Page