A friend of mine just e-mailed me this article: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinio...r_by_its_name_islamist_HT78Wt6NkWoCGq5HIOwlII
He is a terrorist. He is Islamic. But I'm not sure if this is the Islamic Terrorist type of Al-Qaeda and such. It may very well be, but i'll reserve judgement for now. What non-response? Obama did exactly what he should have done. Yes, Bush may have invaded another country here, but thank God those days are over.
The correct response is to say that this is not representative of all or much of Islam or Muslims. If a person, no matter what religion, commits a crime, prosecute to the fullest extent of the law. If that person is part of some overseas organization, go after it. If a country is harboring such organization and diplomacy fails, there's no other choice but combat.
I'm surprised some jackass that glorifies shooting is his internet username hasn't tried something like this.
And they get offended when they are stereotyped. It's 'jihad' and a 'religious duty' to fight for Islam. A holy war, religion rears it's ugly head yet again.