Ok so we know Howard sucks, Webster sucks... can we just get cunningham over with?

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by MIXUM, Nov 19, 2009.

  1. oldguy

    oldguy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2008
    Messages:
    2,817
    Likes Received:
    78
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Re: Ok so we know Howard sucks, Webster sucks... can we just get cunningham over with

    Do YOU watch the fucking games? A player named Brandon is filling Batum's role. Pretty decent player, even when playing out of position.

    I would have thought that you would be able to see that from the box scores, or from this forum.

    Go Blazers
     
  2. MIXUM

    MIXUM Suspended

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    5,983
    Likes Received:
    44
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    radio/mixmaster/club jock/syndication programmer
    Location:
    lurking in the shadows
    Re: Ok so we know Howard sucks, Webster sucks... can we just get cunningham over with

    oldguy lol.... did you notice how howard changed the game last night? how about vs atlanta?

    websters 20 a game has been huge!
     
  3. oldguy

    oldguy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2008
    Messages:
    2,817
    Likes Received:
    78
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Re: Ok so we know Howard sucks, Webster sucks... can we just get cunningham over with

    I haven't seen many comments (if any, but I don't read every thread) that it's not a problem. Lot's of comments about what to do about that problem, if anything.

    What, exactly, is it that you and MIXUM think KP should do? Please be specific....not just 'make a trade', or 'go some balls.' That's not helpful, it's just whining. Who should be cut, or who do they trade for and who goes out to get that person.

    Go Blazers
     
  4. oldguy

    oldguy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2008
    Messages:
    2,817
    Likes Received:
    78
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Re: Ok so we know Howard sucks, Webster sucks... can we just get cunningham over with

    What does that have to do with your statement that Howard, Webster and Cunningham are filling Batum's role, when it's actually Roy filling that role?

    Btw, Howard played 10 & 7 minutes in those two games. Howard gave the team 7 pts and 2 rbs in those two games combined. He shot 75% from the field for those games. Seems like ok numbers for a bench guy to me.

    Martell hasn't played well, so go ahead and throw him under the bus....that's what great fans always do.

    Go Blazers
     
  5. oldmangrouch

    oldmangrouch persona non grata

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    12,403
    Likes Received:
    6,325
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Re: Ok so we know Howard sucks, Webster sucks... can we just get cunningham over with

    Sorry, but you're missing the point.

    Mixum can say "it rains in Oregon", and people will knee-jerk contradict him. I don't have an easy answer to the problem - that is what KP gets paid big bucks for - but I am not going to pretend the problem doesn't exist just because I don't like a poster who brings it up.
     
  6. oldguy

    oldguy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2008
    Messages:
    2,817
    Likes Received:
    78
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Re: Ok so we know Howard sucks, Webster sucks... can we just get cunningham over with

    Are there posters that say there is no problem with having our starting SF out, along with our designated scorer off the bench? I haven't see it.

    :dunno:
     

Share This Page