BREAKING NEWS>>>>New Starting Lineup

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by ucatchtrout, Nov 21, 2009.

Moderators: 6

Moderators

  1. BrianFromWA
  2. Chris Craig
  3. Darkwebs
  4. Ed O
  5. PtldPlatypus
  6. SlyPokerDog
Page 3 of 4
  1. Blazer4life

    Blazer4life Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    497
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    18
    I am a little baffled by this move by Nate. I was pretty sure that he went to the 3 guard lineup so that he could get Miller and Roy acclimated to one another and then move Blake to the bench all the while having him save face. This move really baffles me. I was at the game last night. Blake was terrible. His shooting has been terrible. He was what 2 of 9 last night? Miller can't be happy and being a vet playing behind an inferior player makes me a bit nervous going forward that this team might implode from the inside out. Nates substitutions are bad enough, now Bayless is going to be relegated to only garbage minutes in blowouts. Too much talent on our team to be wasted like this. Frustrating.
     
    Blazer4life, Nov 21, 2009
    #41
  2. illmatic99

    illmatic99 formerly yuyuza1

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    57,711
    Likes Received:
    56,216
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    NYstateofmind
    Is it wrong for me to hope for an injury for you-know-who?
     
    illmatic99, Nov 21, 2009
    #42
  3. ucatchtrout

    ucatchtrout Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    1,461
    Likes Received:
    47
    Trophy Points:
    48

    Too bad Dwight Jaynes wasn't around. He was pretty tough on the Blake thing in his blog today.
     
    ucatchtrout, Nov 21, 2009
    #43
  4. barfo

    barfo triggered obsessive commie pinko boomer maniac Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    34,331
    Likes Received:
    25,354
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Blazer OT board
    The source says Steve's eyes remind him of Jarrett. And that special way he walks. And oh, those summer nights!

    barfo
     
    barfo, Nov 21, 2009
    #44
  5. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,777
    Likes Received:
    27,533
    Trophy Points:
    113


    No. I hope Nate gets injured everyday.
     
    Mediocre Man, Nov 21, 2009
    #45
  6. Ed O

    Ed O Administrator Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    10,701
    Likes Received:
    2,826
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    Oh. Man.

    That would give us all a lot to talk about. For sure. :)

    Ed O.
     
    Ed O, Nov 21, 2009
    #46
  7. ucatchtrout

    ucatchtrout Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    1,461
    Likes Received:
    47
    Trophy Points:
    48
    ...are you saying they are prone to dropping the soap in the shower?
     
    ucatchtrout, Nov 21, 2009
    #47
  8. Buzz Killington

    Buzz Killington Great Sea Urchin Cerviche

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2009
    Messages:
    2,914
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Los Angeles, California
    THE NEGATIVITY IN THIS FREAD IS TOO MUCH. MODS PLEASE MODIFY THIS POST. I'M DONE.

    LATERZ
     
    Buzz Killington, Nov 21, 2009
    #48
  9. barfo

    barfo triggered obsessive commie pinko boomer maniac Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    34,331
    Likes Received:
    25,354
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Blazer OT board
    I'm just saying it's a little unusual for the coach and the point guard to shower together, that's all.

    barfo
     
    barfo, Nov 21, 2009
    #49
  10. Blazer4life

    Blazer4life Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    497
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    18
    On an entirely different topic and worthy I guess of its own thread. Do you think that there could be a developing rift between Pritchard and Nate? I mean, Pritchard brought in all these players via draft and free agency and the way they are being used can't make him all too happy. Especially after all the grief that Pritchard took this summer not being able to get a free agent and when he does Nate won't start him (Miller). This will make the media question the reason as why get him in the 1st place. Maybe there was already a rift because of different philosophies. Maybe that is why Nate only signed a 1 year deal?????:dunno:
     
    Blazer4life, Nov 21, 2009
    #50
  11. andalusian

    andalusian Season - Restarted

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    15,237
    Likes Received:
    14,647
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    San Marcos, CA
    That was one of our best units last year. It was an absolutely fantastic unit, as far as win percent was concerned. The only other unit that played much against the other team's best players that was as good or better was Blake-Fernandez-Roy-Outlaw-Aldridge.

    I l think that a Blake-Rudy-Roy-LMA-Oden would not be a bad unit.

    It's time to reboot Brandon Roy. It's time to let Miller do what Miller do best - which is not play in the half-court.
     
    andalusian, Nov 21, 2009
    #51
  12. julius

    julius Living on the air in Cincinnati... Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    45,068
    Likes Received:
    33,805
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Sales Manager
    Location:
    Cincinnati
    So Blake "won" the PG spot?

    Does anyone h...wait, never mind. My brain doesn't want to try to think like Nate.
     
    julius, Nov 21, 2009
    #52
  13. andalusian

    andalusian Season - Restarted

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    15,237
    Likes Received:
    14,647
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    San Marcos, CA
    No, I think Brandon Roy won it on offense. Blake already had it on defense.
     
    andalusian, Nov 21, 2009
    #53
  14. Ed O

    Ed O Administrator Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    10,701
    Likes Received:
    2,826
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    So you think it'd good for the franchise to throw up its hands and say, "We can't win with Oden and Brandon on the floor together"?

    I think that would be a ridiculous thing to say... and I hope they never do.

    Secondly, if you have Oden and Miller in the second unit, one of the two of them is not going to be optimized.

    Again, though: glad this didn't come to fruition!

    Ed O.
     
    Ed O, Nov 21, 2009
    #54
  15. andalusian

    andalusian Season - Restarted

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    15,237
    Likes Received:
    14,647
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    San Marcos, CA
    No. That's why I added the note about the Blake-Rudy-Roy-LMA-Oden unit below.

    I pointed out that as a unit - that was a very good one last year, and if the team thinks that Oden will benefit more from getting the interior passes from Miller - I can live with it.

    I would have rather seen the Blake/Rudy/Roy/LMA/Oden team and have a team with Miller/JB/Web/Dante/Joel as our fast team.

    I hope they only do it if it is proved that it does not work, but as a stand-alone data point - that was a very very good unit last year.

    Is that really true? You have a fantastic rebounder in Greg who can start the fast-break from the defensive rebound - and if the fast break boggles - you have the team's best post-feed PG giving it to Greg in the post playing inside out. I actually do not think I agree with you on that one.
     
    andalusian, Nov 21, 2009
    #55
  16. Ed O

    Ed O Administrator Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    10,701
    Likes Received:
    2,826
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    Greg is not going to thrive as an offensive player any time soon as part of a running team, and if Miller is in the second unit in order to push the basketball, then that is fewer possessions to feed Oden.

    *shrug*

    Kind of all academic. Even more than most of the things we disagree about :)

    Ed O.
     
    Ed O, Nov 21, 2009
    #56
  17. PHXBlazer1

    PHXBlazer1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2009
    Messages:
    7,093
    Likes Received:
    4,575
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Eugene
    Bwahahahaha!!!! Blake is so much better than Miller, no wonder he's starting. By the way, he loves Portland!! We have a weak-minded front office. Successful businessmen are able to put business before personal relationships.
     
    PHXBlazer1, Nov 21, 2009
    #57
  18. southnc

    southnc Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2009
    Messages:
    187
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    18
    When I saw that new starting lineup, I figured this board would go nuts! :biglaugh:
     
    southnc, Nov 21, 2009
    #58
  19. The Sebastian Express

    The Sebastian Express Snarflepumpkin

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    3,395
    Likes Received:
    61
    Trophy Points:
    48
    A lot of us probably figured you'd have an orgasm that blake wasn't benched for being bad yet.
     
    The Sebastian Express, Nov 21, 2009
    #59
  20. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    124,913
    Likes Received:
    145,184
    Trophy Points:
    115
    Well I'm happy now. I thought the loss last night was because the team played like crap but it turns out that it was because of Miller.
     
    SlyPokerDog, Nov 21, 2009
    #60
Page 3 of 4

Share This Page