I think 3 guard lineups are ok IF you have 1 PG and 2 SG's (who are both 6'6"+) OR, two strong scoring guards, or PG like Isiah Thomas or Allen Iverson. We didn't, we don't and they aren't.
In a search database, just look for the top 10 teams of all time with the combined top 2 scorers, and you will probably find the team with the all-time bottom-scoring 3 starters.
Really? I think three-guard lineups are okay if you win more playing those lineups than otherwise. I also think that nobody is a guard. Who decided that the Platonic Form of the baskeball team was PG, SG, SF, PF, C? The Pistons seem to be doing okay with their funky lineups. Mike D'Antoni started a guy drafted as a PG (Diaw, believe it or not) at C and did great. Whatever works.
I have a brilliant idea, how about writing down a list of who we beat in that stretch and tell us convincingly that we should view that as impressive.
How about you convince me that we could beat the same group with Martell starting over Miller? I'm having increasing difficulty in seeing us beating anybody. The days when we complain about a victory over a weak opponent are over.
We don't necessarily have to trade for a star. IMO any average SF would be better than a guy shooting about .350 from the floor. Fuck man. Even Chase Budinger who was drafted in the 2nd round by Houston last year is playing better than our starting SF.