Sure to you it does but too just about every one else its different. The Sebastian Express put it perfectly
There sure are a lot of women on this board to argue with. Ask anyone in the legal system what "pimp" means. It means JAIL TIME. Ask anyone in Child Support Enforcement what "slut" means. It means the woman is supported for the next 18 years while NOT WORKING, surrounded by kids who love her, and the man lives in poverty WHILE WORKING and living alone. THAT'S what pimp and slut mean. When you grow up, you'll stop pretending you're ghetto and use the real definitions. Edit: I guess I should have already said this, but I hate terms that put people into sexual fear, like cougar, slut, etc. But I sure don't agree that women are in more fear than men. Quite the opposite in the American culture.
mmmm...maybe i should go to the cougar bar tonight...this thread keeps poping up and keeps giving me the idea
I like how you try to subtly suggest that just because someone is a woman their opinion on this is slanted; clearly you did not see my rant about feminism and the beating down of the heterosexual male. I could give two shits if someone is called a slut or a pimp, but to suggest that being called a pimp is equally as offensive as being called a slut is absurd. To keep on track with your silly legal system argument about pimps and sluts (which you then changed to children support enforcement) let's at least be honest: pimp may mean illegal, but if a woman is a working girl (also illegal and commonly referred to as a whore/hooker/slut) or has a reputation as a slut that means if they're raped, sexually abused or harassed and report it to the police their complaint is going to be taken less seriously. Why? Because they aren't respected due to the 'slut' label and reputation, regardless if it is 'earned' or not. Your idea that a woman on child support can live for 18 years just off the child support is ridiculous, and basically a lie. Maybe child support, welfare, and food stamps, but not just child support - if any woman tried to live off child support for an average family child services would investigate (multi millionaire athletes, CEOs, etc are not average families and do not live in poverty). As someone who grew up in a single parent home who was born as the result of an affair my mother (who in this case some perhaps would refer to as a whore, slut, or homewrecker while my father at worst would be called a sleaze I imagine) I started getting child support at age 10, and my father paid 672 dollars a month only because he ran his own construction business and was well off. Hardly a life of poverty for a man, who by the way did not live alone, but with his wife and his two other children. The poor man. Here's the deal: This isn't a ghetto thing (clearly I am trying to pretend I am ghetto with my tendency to be pedantic), this isn't a legal system thing - it is how the majority of the world uses and understands those two terms. Look at the thread on this board entitled "Tiger's a pimp" that is basically a thread of admiration for him having a lot of money and getting a lot of ass, and suggestions he should have just stayed like Derek Jeter who is a notorious bachelor who sees a lot very beautiful women. They think he's fucking cool and the only reason his endorsements and advertisements are on hold is because big companies fear the backlash of women admonishing their husbands out of purchasing his products - but that is another topic on feminism which is an evil thing that must be stopped. But if Tiger was a woman and stories came out how she had seen 14 guys while married, or even not married, a lot of people would be calling her a slut, a whore, and any other number of phrases in a derogatory manner. Not everyone, just like how some women are calling Tiger a pimp in this case too, but a lot of people would be doing so. It doesn't matter to me what people are called, but don't sit there and act like there isn't a distinct social difference between a pimp and a slut. Tiger gets called a pimp out of admiration because a lot of guys would want that kind of money to hit a lot of ass; there's nothing wrong with that at all and no young man or woman should be ashamed of sexual freedom even though as a nation we are rather uptight and prudish. Although I am very against cheating but that isn't a sexual issue, rather a trust issue. On the other hand Lohan, Hilton, Spears, etc are women with a lot of money who are known for getting a lot of ass - I assure you they aren't called sluts or whores in the same admiring way Tiger is called pimp. The actions are the same, although Lohan does enjoy far too many drugs. On a final note back to the child support thing - both parties are equally responsible, and there are men out there that have custody of their children and receive child support from the mother of their kids. If both parties decided they wanted to pull it out of their pants (or I guess put it in their pants) they're as equally as responsible and the child should be put with whatever party can provide the most stable environment. I'd wager 95% of the population understands the consequences of sex and should be prepared to deal with the fall out for their actions. That is all I will say as any more would lead down to a discussion on abortion which probably wouldn't end well. Sincerely, a very ****y slut.
Approximately 80% of your "facts" are untrue, and are the same propaganda we've heard since 1970, but you made it so long that a response would take me an hour to write. If I had an audience of a million, it would be worth the effort, but to attempt to change only 1 or 2 minds is not worth an hour to me. You'll just have to argue your untruths in smaller pieces. I'd much rather argue with someone who is truly suffering than with someone who thinks she's suffering because she gets so much sex that she worries about being called a slut. There is real suffering (experienced by a hundred million Americans with no sex lives), and then there are semantics (which loudmouths worry about while worrying whether they are called sluts).
So basically you got destroyed and don't want to respond and embarrass yourself further, I understand. By the way your assumption that I have so much sex that I'm worried about being called a slut is funny - I have Schizoid Personality Disorder and fall under the category of those who have no interest in sex. I'd be more worried (if I got worried about those things) about being called a frigid, prudish Ice Queen than being called a slut. It was nice engaging with your delusional view on this subject, and I'm sorry you crawled into the hole you dug instead of trying to be rational and knowledgeable. Much love, slutty frigid whore ho blockedoutword anti-feminist personality disordered hooker sandwich and beer serving bitch .
Yes, diagnosed by my psychologist when I was 16. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schizoid_personality_disorder Any and all are free to make jokes about it as I'm pretty comfortable with who I am and I wont take any offense - it won't be a Kingspeed bipolar situation . And yes I am a girl from time to time - some of my friends claim I happen to be a robot posing as a human for scientific experimentation, though. I think I've mentioned it a few rare times, but don't tend to wave my "I have a set of real tits" flag around. Considering my age is 24 and I'm anti-abortion and loathe feminists, I can see why some would automatically assume I am a man.
So does no interest, mean you don't do it at all? I'm just curious if the disorder inhibits your ability or want to be in a relationship. I would assume that if you were in a relationship with someone w/o this disorder they'd need a little physical intimacy...
Do not think I have ever heard a woman called "slut" as a compliment and have rarely heard a male called a "pimp" as a bad thing. For me, cougar and pimp have changed meaning with time. What cougar meant to me before kids and marriage - An older woman that missed her opportunity to get married and have kids that is attractive to younger males by being easy. What cougar meant to me after - An older woman that can get into relationships without the goal of marriage/kids and can leave at anytime hassle free. Pimp as a teenager - Someone smooth and cool. Pimp as a father - Someone that was too stupid to make money and had to resort to victimizing women to survive. On the same level as a rapist IMO.
You've never heard girls call each other "sluts" colloquially? And being called a pimp in front of girls is kind of a bad thing, or at least you need to kind of play it off like it is.
Correct. I have a gigantic personal space issue that's probably my biggest hindrance, and that wouldn't be fair to someone else. I've only met one person outside a few of my cousins who hasn't made me feel extremely agitated if they get too physically close to me. Plus, I have a face made for radio so it's all good! We all have our roles in life, and this is mine and I'm okay with it - maybe I'm here to influence people that just because someone likes being alone doesn't mean they're a sociopath hiding in the dark waiting to strike. Buzz/Agent/thatonenameyouhadwithaX, I've heard some girls call each other slut colloquially, but not a huge amount and I've seen far more get upset than laugh; and god forbid a guy jokingly call them that. And yeah from time to time being called a pimp infront of a girl is a bad thing because feminists have to rip the balls off of all straight men. I really have no issue at all with people being called sluts or pimps because I think the only way you can empower words is by responding to them negatively or positively. Regardless if I get called a ****, slut, whore, hooker, bitch, psycho, asshole, jackass, idiot, etc I just laugh because if my friends do it I just call them one back after the laughter, and if it is someone who is serious I don't give a fuck. I stopped letting name calling make me angry after junior high, and now just respond with amusement. The only reason I responded here was because jlprk wanted to act like the words were equally as offensive to a large portion of the population, and that's being disingenuous. His responses only reconfirm his disingenuous. So basically the using of the words means very little to me and if they're ever said to me I just laugh, but the suggestion that the words are equally offensive in most settings (aka where people take things far too seriously) is what irritated me.
