I am sacrificing myself in the predictions game so that the team can succeed. Every time I predict they will lose, I know they will win.
It's just a joke going around. I keep messing with my Nets friends that they'll pick #4, and they agree, they have no hope to get #1 even if they never win another game. It's just the way the lottery can work.
So do they draft John Wall if they get the #1 and put 2 PG in the back court? There are different problems on the horizon for this team.
The team with the worst record almost never gets the #1 pick. I don't mind them losing, i love seeing records being broke! WHat would be dope is they only win 8 games, but Devin Harris scores 101 points in the last game of the year......... and they lose!
As we've all been told, Yi is an All Star. He's so dominating, his team wins almost 8% of the time they step on the court.
In the S2 tradition of misusing team stats as individual stats, I'd like to point out that Devin Harris has a win% of 8.3% and a net/48 of -14.5 - the worst numbers on the team by a fair margin. Here's why I put little value on the win% numbers at 82games.com. The Nets have won 7.7% of their games, yet they don't have a single player in their roster outside of Chris Quinn who has played a total of 31 minutes all season, who has a win% less than 8.3%. In fact, many of their players have a win% above 30% and some of their key reserves are actually above 50%. So, how can that be? Obviously the total is less than the sum of the parts. How can so many of their players have a win% far above what they've actually won, yet nobody playing close to significant minutes has a win% below their team winning percentage of 7.7%? BNM
So, if New Jersey ends up 6-76, do they petition Philly to change their name to the "Seventy-Sixers"?
