If we got Phil Jackson..

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by Natebishop3, Jan 31, 2010.

  1. Boob-No-More

    Boob-No-More Why you no hire big man coach?

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2008
    Messages:
    19,094
    Likes Received:
    22,763
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Again, that wasn't the point. The point is it doesn't take three years to learn the triangle. Both of those teams INSTANTLY got BETTER. It didn't take three years to see significant improvement.

    The Blazers won 54 games last season, and probably would have won as many, or a few more this season, if healthy. Phil in the triangle wouldn't guarantee a title in Portland in his first or second year, but I do think it would elevate them (if reasonably healthy) to contender status.

    BNM
     
  2. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    94,072
    Likes Received:
    57,230
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    All the more reason to come here! ;)

    We are the bane of his existence.
     
  3. Shapecity

    Shapecity S2/JBB Teamster Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2003
    Messages:
    45,018
    Likes Received:
    57
    Trophy Points:
    48
    They didn't INSTANTLY get better. Those teasms were already good. Lakers won 61 games prior to the lockout season and were in the WCF. Del Harris just couldn't put them over the top.
     
  4. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    94,072
    Likes Received:
    57,230
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    And they got rid of Nick Van Exel, Eddie Jones, and Elden Campbell, while adding Glen Rice.
     
  5. Boob-No-More

    Boob-No-More Why you no hire big man coach?

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2008
    Messages:
    19,094
    Likes Received:
    22,763
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Umm... going from a team that couldn't make the finals to winning it all in his first season is pretty much the definition of INSTANTLY getting better.

    Del Harris couldn't get them over the top, but Phil did in his first season. Again, how is that not INSTANTLY getting better? Is it the same? No. Is it worse? No. Then it must be better. Right?

    BNM
     

Share This Page