What about Biedrins?

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by Blaze01, Feb 12, 2010.

  1. Blaze01

    Blaze01 JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2004
    Messages:
    2,106
    Likes Received:
    50
    Trophy Points:
    48
    First off, I have to say the Golden State is stupid if they want to get rid of thier only viable big man for cap space...

    http://basketball.realgm.com/src_wi...12/warriors_explore_biedrins_trade_scenarios/

    But this guy would be a great pickup for POR...

    Travis Outlaw, Steve Blake and a future 1st for Biedrins?

    Or I'd even throw in thier choice of Pendergraph, Cunningham, Mills or one of our overseas players (Koponen, Claver or Freeland) instead of the 1st...

    http://www.realgm.com/src_playerfile/955/andris_biedrins/

    He has been hurt this year but had been steadily improving before then...
     
  2. Nikolokolus

    Nikolokolus There's always next year

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    30,704
    Likes Received:
    6,198
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I fucking love him.
     
  3. Sheldon Shape

    Sheldon Shape Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2008
    Messages:
    7,594
    Likes Received:
    6,469
    Trophy Points:
    113
    He would be just an awesome addition to this team and is still very young that he could be a huge piece to a championship run in the future.
     
  4. noknobs

    noknobs Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    4,911
    Likes Received:
    6,292
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'd like Biedrins, although I didn't know his contract was 36 million over 4 more years. He's pretty productive when he gets minutes, but often he doesn't because A) Don Nelson is a horrible coach, and B) fouls. But I'd love what he could give us.
     
  5. Boob-No-More

    Boob-No-More Why you no hire big man coach?

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2008
    Messages:
    19,094
    Likes Received:
    22,763
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's not obvious from the subject line, but that's exactly what I've been discussing in this thread for the last couple days.

    I'd do Blake, Outlaw and Rudy for Biedrins in a heartbeat. It works under the CBA and it gives us a huge upgrade at center this season. Biedrins is young and can play the 5 or 4. So, long term it gives us a three man 5/4 rotation of Oden, Biedrins and Aldridge. Which also makes Joel a tradable asset next season with his expiring contract (assuming he opts in).

    It gives GS two expiring contracts, for the costs savings they desire and a cheap, reasonably young player that would fit well in Nellie's system. I'd even thorugh in Patty Mills and/or our lottery protected 2010 1st round pick to sweeten the deal if necessary.

    BNM
     
  6. Nikolokolus

    Nikolokolus There's always next year

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    30,704
    Likes Received:
    6,198
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That trade makes too much sense for it to happen
     
  7. LittleAlex

    LittleAlex Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    2,824
    Likes Received:
    54
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I would trade anyone on the team not named Roy, Oden, Batum or LMA for Biedrins.

    Too bad he will probably end up going to the Lakers for Morison and The Machine.
     
  8. Chuck Taylor

    Chuck Taylor BATUUUM SHAKKA LAKKA!

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2008
    Messages:
    1,183
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Portland
    I likey...

    Plus, he's already used to not playing as many minutes as he deserves under Don Nelson. Probably wouldn't have a big problem backing up LMA next year.
     
  9. MIXUM

    MIXUM Suspended

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    5,983
    Likes Received:
    44
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    radio/mixmaster/club jock/syndication programmer
    Location:
    lurking in the shadows
    kpee pulling this off?

    no chance in hell. im sure he hasnt even talked to gs
     
  10. Ed O

    Ed O Administrator Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    10,701
    Likes Received:
    2,826
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    Yep. I'd do it.

    Plus, from Nelly's perspective? It helps him win games this year, which is critical as he approaches the all-time mark.

    The Warriors don't make the playoffs after getting those three guys, but they get better. In the long run that might not be a good move, but since when have the Warriors cared about the long run?

    Ed O.
     
  11. Minstrel

    Minstrel Top Of The Pops Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    26,226
    Likes Received:
    14,407
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    User Interface Designer
    Location:
    Hello darkness, my old friend
    I'd be thrilled to get Biedrins for only expiring contracts and Fernandez. Biedrins has been an impact player outside of this season. He's still really young. A long-term big man rotation of Oden/Aldridge/Biedrins would be amazing. Biedrins might even start over Aldridge, if Aldridge doesn't improve his game.
     
  12. Boob-No-More

    Boob-No-More Why you no hire big man coach?

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2008
    Messages:
    19,094
    Likes Received:
    22,763
    Trophy Points:
    113
    My original trade proposal (Blake + Outlaw + Rudy for Biedrins) was the simplest trade that met our needs and GSW's wants.

    If they want more, we could throw in one or two more cheap players and/or draft picks.

    I mentioned Patty Mills as I thought he'd fit in well in Nellie's system, but with Monta Ellis and Steph Curry in front of him, he might not get a lot of PT. All three of our 2009 second rounders make the same salary ($457,588), but Mills is only signed for 1 year, Cunningham for 2 and Pendergraph for 3 (3rd year not fully guaranteed). We could add two of these players to the original proposal and it would still work. They may want Pendergraph as a big cheap body to help replace some of Biedrins lost minutes, and if they move Magette, they may also want Cunningham (especially if they planned to let Outlaw walk when his contract expires). I don't have a problem giving up Pendergraph or Mills. Cunningham would be tougher. We'd still have Batum and Webster, but I'd hate to give up both Outlaw and Cunningham.

    If they want to also dump Maggette to save even more salary, it's still quite workable (CBA wise). I'm not a huge Maggette fan (seems selfish to me), but he would certianly give us another proven scorer to take some of the burden off Roy.

    If we add Maggette and Joel to the original proposal it works. That's:

    Blake + Outlaw + Rudy + Joel for Biedrins + Maggette

    They'd have to waive Joel's physical, but that trade gets them out of two huge long term contracts (which is supposedly what they are trying to accomplish to make the team more attractive to a potential buyer such as Larry Ellison).

    That trade still has room for us to add a couple more cheap players and/or draft picks as sweeteners.

    I personally prefer the original, simpler proposal, but I would not be against the second.

    BNM
     
  13. Boob-No-More

    Boob-No-More Why you no hire big man coach?

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2008
    Messages:
    19,094
    Likes Received:
    22,763
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yep, as I mentioned in the other thread, I love that this trade addressed our current need for a bigger, better starting center AND works long term with the Oden/Biedrins/Aldridge three man 5/4 rotation.

    So, it helps us both short term and long term.

    BNM
     
  14. MIXUM

    MIXUM Suspended

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    5,983
    Likes Received:
    44
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    radio/mixmaster/club jock/syndication programmer
    Location:
    lurking in the shadows
    this is all great....

    except kpee is our gm
     
  15. WarriorFan

    WarriorFan Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2008
    Messages:
    529
    Likes Received:
    78
    Trophy Points:
    28
    How does that meet GS needs? They want to rid rid of bad contracts, like Maggette, not just cut spending. Beans contract is good, very reasonable for a good young center who is near the lead lead in FG%, 10+ boards, and decent but improving D (this injury plagued season being the exception). Plus he and Turiaf are their only centers and there's no way Turiaf can stay on the floor for 30 min. He's not going anywhere for just cap space. I don't doubt he gets traded, but it will be a deal like they talked about last offseason for Amare or another good big. Riley says they are not looking at adding a big time player this year but I really hope he's playing possum and going after Bosh. A package of Biedrins, Wright/Randolph, and a first may do it, if Toronto expects Wright/Randolph to recover from their injuries.
     
  16. MIXUM

    MIXUM Suspended

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    5,983
    Likes Received:
    44
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    radio/mixmaster/club jock/syndication programmer
    Location:
    lurking in the shadows
    dont worry warrior fan...

    1. this is text book blazer fan trades

    2. kpee couldnt pull off this deal in 1000 years.
     
  17. Boob-No-More

    Boob-No-More Why you no hire big man coach?

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2008
    Messages:
    19,094
    Likes Received:
    22,763
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I was merely going by the recent articles in the San Jose Mercury News stating that the Warriors are trying to dump Biedrins and Maggette to make the team more attractive to a potential buyer.

    Obviously, this isn't about talent. Unloading Biedrins and Maggette would save the new ownership over $66 million in salary (and possibly luxury tax payments). Perhaps the new owner doesn't want to invest that kind of money in a team that isn't going to make the play-offs anytime soon. Perhaps he'd rather save the money and rebuild from the ground up with cheap young talent and draft picks.

    The Warriors salary dump idea wasn't mine. I just addressed how Portland could make it happen.

    BNM
     
  18. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,324
    Likes Received:
    43,686
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Fine--Make it Joel, Rudy, Webster and Outlaw for Maggette and Biedrins. I'd still do it.
     
  19. oldguy

    oldguy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2008
    Messages:
    2,817
    Likes Received:
    78
    Trophy Points:
    48
    You need to bump the turntable. That record is skipping. KP, wah...KP, wah...KP, wah. Great listening.

    Go Blazers
     
  20. LittleAlex

    LittleAlex Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    2,824
    Likes Received:
    54
    Trophy Points:
    48
    No one here believes this would be a good deal for the Warriors.

    In the long though it may be. If it facilitates the team being sold to someone who isn't mentally handicapped.


    I just don't think Golden State is making personel descisions based on basketball. Rather they are based on either the bottom line or whatever whim comes to the management team that day.

    The Warriors have some the best fans in the NBA. It's a fucking crime what the team's owner is doing their fans.
     

Share This Page