Not particularly problematic to me. It's cliche, but kids grow up a whole lot faster these days than in the past. It's not like they're not already exposed to this kind of stuff on TV, whether or not they're mimicking the dancing. I don't personally think there's a harmful aspect to boys or girls knowing about sex or sexuality from even an early age. If these were boys mimicking sexually charged male dancers, would those who have a problem with this be as concerned? In any case, that's pretty impressive choreography for seven year olds.
It is funny that you go so crazy when people stereotype republicans, but then join in in stereotyping the left. Your bias and hypocrisy knows no bounds. I'm waiting for BlazerBoy to come in here and blast MediocreMan for stereotyping liberals in here. Because we know that he isn't partisan and when a wrong is committed, no matter what side of the isle, he will step in to right it.
In the communes around 1970, the idea was back to nature, like a nudist camp, including adults and kids. No one thought of having sex with a kid. As part of the general withdrawal from sex in the 1980s (done under the pretext of feminism, though feminists were just dupes for a larger agenda by our anonymous rulers), the quasi-religious legal system decided that nudity harms kids (no science was presented) and ever since, has had the compliant media present this as unquestioned reality. (Before that, in the 70s, you saw both sides in the media.) Now at any given time, there are hundreds of Americans in jail, unemployable the rest of their lives, because their kid saw them either naked or having sex. Someday 1970 will return and we'll again hear from both sides instead of just one on radical issues.
I'm not a Republican, so I haven't complained about people stereotyping them. I've corrected people like you who try to stereotype me as some social conservative simply because I prefer smaller government. BTW, if parents of a candidate on the right used their kids to put together such a Riefenstahlesque video, I'd mock them for it too.
I don't see the problem, except that they make the Blazers Dancers (not the Jr's) look like amateurs. barfo
Some of those dance moves would be inappropriate if performed by grown women in front of children. 7-year-old girls doing them? Absolutely wrong. They're very good at what they do, they just shouldn't be doing it like that. As for the Junior Blazer Dancers, their choreography has been infinitely less creepy the last couple of seasons. Moves made by the Blazer Dancers are getting more and more stripper-like, and less and less appropriate. I blame the Ducks cheerleaders.
If there really was a hell, these kids parents would have reservations. Any father who would allow that is a pedophile who molests his daughter frequently. Any mother who allows it is a skanky whore living vicariously through her child's abuse. Let's call this little number "The Ballad of Jon Benet".
Grown women being naked in front of children is (in some circumstances) inappropriate. That doesn't mean children being naked is inappropriate. Wait, 7-year-old girls are doing grown women? I'd like to see that. No, wait, I mean, bad! bad! They need to incorporate some props into their routines. For example, a lamppost with the street sign "Sandy Blvd." would set the tone. barfo
Its being wide spread. Just found this on youtube. [video=youtube;JYc2bQjQLTM]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYc2bQjQLTM&feature=related[/video]
Too bad these aren't 18 years old. [video=youtube;Yj4vHZ0rkHQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yj4vHZ0rkHQ&feature=related[/video]
For the record, please remove any instance of my name associated with this thread. In case it ends up on the desk of some FBI Internet Officer.
