If you're trying to say that political people having sex outside of marriage is a republican issue, then you are ready for a padded cell.
Funny how you missed the important part of his post, where he talks about how R's seem to not practice what they preach, and D's don't practice it...but they also don't preach it.
they're hypocritical for different reasons though. Not this reason (they're LAME for this reason though)
Do we need to create a list of republicans who condemned homosexuality, or promiscuity, only to end up being gay themselves or slept with women who weren't their wives? i would bet you it's bigger than the d's who did the same.
I believe I qualified my post with the word "mostly". Certainly there are exceptions to the rule, and Spitzer is one. But if anyone wants to claim there are more democrats than republicans trying to legislate restrictions on sexual behavior, I'd be happy to have that debate. barfo
It clearly goes both ways. One side preaches abstinence, the other taxes us to pay for condoms to hand out to children in school.
I guess if John Edwards spoke out in favor of condom distribution and use (and I don't know if he did or didn't), then he'd be an excellent example of that. Not sure how many other non-condom users there are on the democratic side. barfo
Not a lot of difference if you ask me. But have it your way. Republicans = Hypocrites Democrats = Liars