Vince, because he's a better shooter and just as, if not more athletic. J-Rich is a volume shooter, meaning he needs to put up a ton of shots to shoot a good percentage, while Carter is more consistent.
Vince Carter. VC is the better shooter, dunker, basically he's the better all-around player than J-Rich. I think that J-Rich is quite a bit overrated.
hmmm, Vince when he decides to not be lazy and attack the rim, JRich when Vince decides to be lazy and just shoots jumpers all the time.
Vince Carter when he isn't injured in some sort of way. He is such of an offensive powerhouse. And his defense isn't bad either. J-Rich is a good offensive player and telented ,but, no match to Carter.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (HEAT4Champs @ May 20 2006, 04:40 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Vince Carter when he isn't injured in some sort of way. He is such of an offensive powerhouse. And his defense isn't bad either. J-Rich is a good offensive player and telented ,but, no match to Carter.</div>Are you kidding? His defense is horrible
Imma say they're about equal because they are both great dunkers. But they have some differences that cancel out. VC is a better inside shooter than J-Rich (but he hardly attempts any, with all those 3's) and J-Rich is a much better 3-pt. shooter.
This is a good comparison. Both, amazing dunkers. Vince is better at dunking, he's more creative and is a better finisher. Both solid three point shooters, they're even there. Vince has more experiance, and playoff experiance. I say Vince Carter. But, by the time both of their careers are over J-Rich may be better.
Vince Carter is still a slightly better scorer than JRich, if not for only his ability to score in the post and hitn fadeaways. He simply has a better offensive arsenal.Vince is a much better passer. JRich is a guy like Kobe, Stephon, Francis, where he gets msileading assist numbers because he is always handling the ball, and attacks, attacks, opwning up passing opportunities. However, what the average NBA fan doesn't see, is that Richardson rarely passes when he doesn't need to, and uses his athletisicm to get off passes he shouldn't need to attempt. Vince on the other hand, is a great passer in all facets. Transition, out of the post, drive and kick, swinging the ball.Both play no defence.JRich and Vince are almost equal in terms of rebounding. No real edge there.Neither have won so you can't use that.Both are garbage int he clutch.Basically, Vince wins it off being better at JRich at scoring - the only thing JRich can do on a consistent basis
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (KMart @ May 20 2006, 11:07 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Vince Carter is still a slightly better scorer than JRich, if not for only his ability to score in the post and hitn fadeaways. He simply has a better offensive arsenal.Vince is a much better passer. JRich is a guy like Kobe, Stephon, Francis, where he gets msileading assist numbers because he is always handling the ball, and attacks, attacks, opwning up passing opportunities. However, what the average NBA fan doesn't see, is that Richardson rarely passes when he doesn't need to, and uses his athletisicm to get off passes he shouldn't need to attempt. Vince on the other hand, is a great passer in all facets. Transition, out of the post, drive and kick, swinging the ball.Both play no defence.JRich and Vince are almost equal in terms of rebounding. No real edge there.Neither have won so you can't use that.Both are garbage int he clutch.Basically, Vince wins it off being better at JRich at scoring - the only thing JRich can do on a consistent basis</div>Vince sure killed us in the clutch. I wouldnt say he is garbage in the clutch.
