Gun rights case: Supreme Court rules on second amendment

Discussion in 'Blazers OT Forum' started by Denny Crane, Jun 28, 2010.

  1. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    I agree with you about Roe, but I think the vast majority of abortions were before viability anyhow. I never particularly liked the decision, because I found it to be too much like legislation (not the court's role) and not a Remedy (which is the court's role).

    In my view, abortion should be legal, and the woman has every right to privacy and her own body. Though at some point there is an implicit contract (parental rights in exchange for bringing the fetus to term) that is applied. I do see abortion as killing a human being, but I see that killing human beings is something that happens lawfully all the time - cops shoot people, people kill people in self defense (which is what abortion is!), people kill people on the battlefield, people kill people when it comes to the death penalty, etc.

    I posted the quote from Jefferson because it may give us a clue as to what the people involved in writing the constitution and knew its original intent had to say at the time.
     
  2. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
  3. barfo

    barfo triggered obsessive commie pinko boomer maniac Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    34,365
    Likes Received:
    25,406
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Blazer OT board
    Obviously, then, basketball should not be allowed.

    As to the point, it's quite obvious that arms are no longer necessary to defend from usurpers within or without. We have the biggest military in the world to defend ourselves from without, and plenty-o-police/fbi/secret service to defend ourselves from within. It's no more relevant to the modern world than is his admonition against playing hoops.

    barfo
     
  4. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    Here's sig material. Quote if you like:

    The constitution has mechanisms that allow it to be changed. Go for it. Otherwise, there's nothing about how some concept perfectly provided by the constitution affects the way barfo's sphincter twitches that it should be changed.
     
  5. BLAZER PROPHET

    BLAZER PROPHET Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    18,725
    Likes Received:
    191
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    dental malpractice claims adjuster
    Location:
    Portland area
    So when an intruder enters your house or a gang is stalking you we just call the "plenty-o-police/fbi/secret service to defend ourselves"? I know you were joking with that one.
     
  6. barfo

    barfo triggered obsessive commie pinko boomer maniac Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    34,365
    Likes Received:
    25,406
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Blazer OT board
    No, Denny was talking about usurpers of government, not personal property.

    Personal protection is a whole different matter, and may or may not justify gun ownership, but certainly has nothing to do with the 2nd amendment, unless you are bunking a "well-regulated Militia" in your house.

    barfo
     
  7. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,325
    Likes Received:
    43,687
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Personally, I've always viewed the entire Bill of Rights as primarily protecting the populace against potential government overreaches. With that in mind, I've always viewed the "right to bear arms" as intended to ensure that the general populace has the means to defend themselves against a government that attempts to migrate from democracy to monarchy. In my mind, the "militia" portion of the 2nd amendment is essentially acknowledging that the government will, by definition of its responsibilities, be armed, therefore it is important the the citizenry also retain the right to be armed, lest they be unable to withstand tyranny.
     
  8. barfo

    barfo triggered obsessive commie pinko boomer maniac Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    34,365
    Likes Received:
    25,406
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Blazer OT board
    That makes sense to me, historically. It doesn't make much sense to me in the context of the current situation. Because if the government goes bad, what of the military? If they turn against the government, game over - no need for citizens to fire a shot. If they side with the government, game over. Our muskets and such aren't going to be any match for their weaponry.

    Where weapons will be really useful is if the government collapses altogether. Then we can shoot each other with our guns. That'll be some big fun.

    barfo
     
  9. MARIS61

    MARIS61 Real American

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,007
    Likes Received:
    5,012
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired Yankee
    Location:
    Beautiful Central Oregon
    You really don't get it, do you?

    The military, police, and dozens of "secret" government agencies devoted to spying on and controlling US citizens are the potential enemies of our country that make it necessary for us to have an armed militia of private citizens. They are the usurpers from within.
     
  10. barfo

    barfo triggered obsessive commie pinko boomer maniac Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    34,365
    Likes Received:
    25,406
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Blazer OT board
    In that case, see my prior post: your guns have zero hope of prevailing. Back when there were just muskets and cannons, guys with muskets could hope to prevail. Guys with handguns and rifles cannot hope to win out against a force with drones, f-22s, tanks, etc.

    barfo
     
  11. Minstrel

    Minstrel Top Of The Pops Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    26,226
    Likes Received:
    14,407
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    User Interface Designer
    Location:
    Hello darkness, my old friend
    Typical. The military, as an arm of the government, would be inefficient. The privately run citizen army would be much more efficient, making up the difference in the grade of the weapons. The private sector does everything more efficiently, including waging war. Until you understand that, you're going to keep being wrong.
     
  12. barfo

    barfo triggered obsessive commie pinko boomer maniac Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    34,365
    Likes Received:
    25,406
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Blazer OT board
    Oh! I forgot about the superiority of the private sector! Silly me. No doubt with the savings from not paying slavery taxes, we could construct our own fighter planes, nuclear warheads, and tanks. And if not, we could make a strategic alignment with Iran, or North Korea. The battle would be glorious!

    barfo
     
  13. BLAZER PROPHET

    BLAZER PROPHET Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    18,725
    Likes Received:
    191
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    dental malpractice claims adjuster
    Location:
    Portland area
    Hi, Maris. Hope things are well. BTW, I knew you'd be here to espouse the communist point of view.
     
  14. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    MARIS actually got one right.
     
  15. maxiep

    maxiep RIP Dr. Jack

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,303
    Likes Received:
    5,884
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Merchant Banker
    Location:
    Denver, CO & Lake Oswego, OR
  16. bodyman5001

    bodyman5001 Genius

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2008
    Messages:
    2,147
    Likes Received:
    30
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Occupation:
    auto collision technician
    Location:
    Las Vegas
    How about ignoring the word PEOPLE? If they wanted to say the right of the MILITIA to keep and bear arms it wouldn't have been difficult. Yet after just mentioning the word militia, they decided to use the word people instead? Maybe they wanted to differentiate between the two? Even if they didn't, they used the word people and last I checked I am one of those.

    Would you define the word militia and describe to us how a militia would be structured around the year 1800 or so? Thanks.
     
    maxiep likes this.
  17. boatsandstars

    boatsandstars Lilywhite.

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2008
    Messages:
    397
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    18
    People who own guns are retarded. That is probably most of you.
     
  18. bodyman5001

    bodyman5001 Genius

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2008
    Messages:
    2,147
    Likes Received:
    30
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Occupation:
    auto collision technician
    Location:
    Las Vegas
    I have a shotgun in the wall of my house. It is loaded and ready to fire. I know exactly where it is because I put it there when I moved in. I had to fix a hole that the prior owner left in the wall and figured that if nobody knows it is there but me, it can only help me.

    I don't really own a gun but if I did have an extra shotgun that idea actually sounds good to me.
     
  19. barfo

    barfo triggered obsessive commie pinko boomer maniac Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    34,365
    Likes Received:
    25,406
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Blazer OT board
    That's nothing. I have a 9mm pistol embedded in my abdomen. I was having surgery a few years back and paid the surgeon to install it. If I press a finger into my belly in just the right spot, I can fire a round into anyone standing in front of me.

    The only downside is that I always set off the metal detectors at airports.

    barfo
     
  20. bodyman5001

    bodyman5001 Genius

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2008
    Messages:
    2,147
    Likes Received:
    30
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Occupation:
    auto collision technician
    Location:
    Las Vegas
    Thank GOD the thing isn't triggered by your head being inserted in your @##, there wouldn't be anyone near you left alive.
     

Share This Page