Tony Parker instead?

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by NWDJ, Jul 13, 2010.

  1. NWDJ

    NWDJ Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Messages:
    64
    Likes Received:
    36
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    Oregon
    Would it be easier to get Parker then Chris Paul? Maybe not have to give up as much?

    Just asking.
     
  2. Nikolokolus

    Nikolokolus There's always next year

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    30,704
    Likes Received:
    6,198
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Only RC Buford or George Shinn could tell you what it would take to get either guy. My feelings are that Parker would be easier to get, but none of us have anything but our uninformed opinions.
     
  3. Rastapopoulos

    Rastapopoulos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    41,767
    Likes Received:
    26,108
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Ballin'
    The Spurs just signed Splitter (for a RIDICULOUSLY low sum), who is basically Brook Lopez with an edge. They're gearing up for one final push. The only way either of those guys gets traded is for each other.
     
  4. BoBoBREWSKI

    BoBoBREWSKI BURP!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    14,318
    Likes Received:
    5,778
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    NW
    Do we need another Parker thread? Just asking.
     
  5. Idog1976

    Idog1976 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2009
    Messages:
    6,730
    Likes Received:
    3,927
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    I look to the stars.
    Location:
    P-Town baby!
    Ugh, I forgot the Spurs got Tiago Splitter. Jesus. Well maybe there is a trade in the future. For the record I don't want Parker.

    I wouldn't turn him down if given away, but I sure as hell wouldn't gut the team for him. Even Batum seems a bit steep as I feel our identity MUST be a defensive one after this summer.
     

Share This Page