Supreme Court strikes down FCC indecency rule

Discussion in 'Blazers OT Forum' started by hasoos, Jul 13, 2010.

  1. hasoos

    hasoos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    9,418
    Likes Received:
    97
    Trophy Points:
    48
  2. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,096
    Likes Received:
    9,073
    Trophy Points:
    113
    so can I expect to see CSI:Miami actually showing dead strippers naked, while going to commercial with Horatio saying something like "that (expletive adjective) (racial epithet) (sexual epithet) really did a job on that (expletive adjective) (racial epithet) (derogatory feminine slang)", and coming back from commercial with a recreation of Marisa Tomei/Philip Seymour Hoffman from Before Devil Knows You're Dead, all on at 8 o'clock on a Sunday night?
     
  3. barfo

    barfo triggered obsessive commie pinko boomer maniac Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    34,350
    Likes Received:
    25,383
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Blazer OT board
    Looks like it is actually an appeals court, not the supremes, that ruled on this.

    barfo
     
  4. BoBoBREWSKI

    BoBoBREWSKI BURP!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    14,327
    Likes Received:
    5,801
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    NW
    HA HA!

    [​IMG]
     
  5. Minstrel

    Minstrel Top Of The Pops Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    26,226
    Likes Received:
    14,407
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    User Interface Designer
    Location:
    Hello darkness, my old friend
    No, that's more Saturday morning network television fare. Primetime will be more adult-oriented.
     
  6. Minstrel

    Minstrel Top Of The Pops Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    26,226
    Likes Received:
    14,407
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    User Interface Designer
    Location:
    Hello darkness, my old friend
    At the Supreme Court's behest:

    "But the Supreme Court's 5-4 ruling was focused on the way the FCC enacted its tougher policy and sent the case back to the New York court to decide the broader issue of the constitutionality of the ban on profanity on the broadcast airwaves."

    Not sure what that means. Does the Supreme Court ask lower courts to decide things and then take the case again to decide if they agree with that the lower court decided?
     
  7. barfo

    barfo triggered obsessive commie pinko boomer maniac Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    34,350
    Likes Received:
    25,383
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Blazer OT board
    The motherfucking supreme court just likes to fuck with the fucking appeals court, make them rule and then fucking overturn the fuckers. Extra fucking profanity added to fucking stay on topic.

    barfo
     
  8. hasoos

    hasoos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    9,418
    Likes Received:
    97
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Fuckin Ass! You are spot on motherfucker!
     
  9. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    Two points. SCOTUS typically doesn't make broad sweeping decisions. Even Brown v. Board of Education, they demanded that segregation in schools be ended "with all due haste". Yeah, things like abortion get brought to the Court every so often, not ultimately to overturn it but to fine tune what's in govt.'s purview.

    This decision only affects things like the wardrobe malfunction and people on awards shows saying words that would otherwise be bleeped. It doesn't at all permit the showing of uncut R rated films.
     
  10. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    Let's show some respect. It's commie purplo fuckin' ass! motherfucker to you.
     
  11. Anima

    Anima WuShock

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2007
    Messages:
    1,361
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Professional Student
    Location:
    Wichita, KS
    Actually the ruling says that networks can't be held responsible for people cussing unexpectedly during live broadcasts. Although I would love to see the ruling fully overturned (never happen), but that has more to do with my feelings that the Government shouldn't try to regulate the media or speech in any way.
     
  12. Eastoff

    Eastoff But it was a beginning.

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Messages:
    16,057
    Likes Received:
    4,034
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Tualatin
    ^^^ so you're saying we should expect more live broadcasts, and unedited live broadcasts?
     
  13. MARIS61

    MARIS61 Real American

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,007
    Likes Received:
    5,012
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired Yankee
    Location:
    Beautiful Central Oregon
    It sets a precedent for further legal action should those things be restricted in the future.

    FCC, welcome to the 19th century.

    I can think of no government entity, other than Homeland Security of course, that is more anti-American in it's mission and it's practice.
     

Share This Page