Interesting Tony Parker speculation

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by Rastapopoulos, Jul 13, 2010.

?

Would you trade Batum for Tony Parker?

  1. Don't be a nutty nutcase, of course I wouldn't!

    43.6%
  2. Don't be a nutty nutcase, of course I would!

    14.5%
  3. I'd spend a few sleepless nights and then flip a coin

    20.0%
  4. I refuse to answer this question on religious grounds (Batumism)

    21.8%
  1. BLAZINGGIANTS

    BLAZINGGIANTS Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2008
    Messages:
    22,029
    Likes Received:
    14,602
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What makes you think Quick knows anything?
     
  2. SpamKing

    SpamKing "Moisten needle before inserting"

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2008
    Messages:
    350
    Likes Received:
    161
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Occupation:
    Have Fun will Travel
    No way... Parker has begun to slide, while Nic has yet to show us all he can be...
     
  3. maxiep

    maxiep RIP Dr. Jack

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,303
    Likes Received:
    5,884
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Merchant Banker
    Location:
    Denver, CO & Lake Oswego, OR
    LeBron James?
     
  4. shamelessblazer

    shamelessblazer Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2008
    Messages:
    629
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    18
    I think that the spurs would be interested in something that looked more like:

    Blazers out: Andre, JPEC, Bayless, Rudy
    Blazers In: Parker, Mcdyess

    Spurs in: Trade exemption, Pryzbilla, Bayless, ? (picks)
    Spurs Out: Parker, Mcdyess

    3rd Team with cap space in: Miller, Rudy
    3rd Team with cap space out: trade exemption...

    the real question is who the 3rd team would be, New Jersey, New York, Washington, Indiana and a few others come to mind. For a team looking to add a shooter (Rudy) or a facilitator (Andre) the price and risk are fairly cheap. Perhaps they'd supply a draft pick or young player. The spurs would save money and add Bayless basically.
     
  5. Rastapopoulos

    Rastapopoulos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    41,767
    Likes Received:
    26,109
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Ballin'
    I had another sudden thought: there's another player the Blazers have that the Spurs were rumored to be very interested in, and that Matthews would easily replace: Elliot Williams. Perhaps there's another reason he's been held out of Summer League - he's not really our player?
     
  6. Idog1976

    Idog1976 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2009
    Messages:
    6,730
    Likes Received:
    3,927
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    I look to the stars.
    Location:
    P-Town baby!
    Now that trade I would do in a heartbeat.

    To Maxiep...what's this stuff about J. Quick alluding to a Parker trade? Link?
     
  7. B-Roy

    B-Roy If it takes months

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2008
    Messages:
    31,701
    Likes Received:
    24,927
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You know the Spurs picked before us right? They could have had him if they wanted him.
     
  8. Rastapopoulos

    Rastapopoulos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    41,767
    Likes Received:
    26,109
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Ballin'
    Oh yeah.... Forgot about James Anderson. But maybe they only picked him because they thought Williams really was injured? (Yeah, that's MUCH more likely than this whole "overheard Nate say TP" thing being bullshit...)

    Tell you what would REALLY make me happy - if we picked a player for San Antonio, and it was Babbitt.
     
  9. Pinwheel1

    Pinwheel1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    23,192
    Likes Received:
    15,646
    Trophy Points:
    113
    We are talking Pop. He loves TP. If he thought TP has anything left then he would make sure he re-signs. If he trades him, that tells me pop has doubts about the mileage of his Peugot. Nothing worse than relying on a run down Peugot. I would be leary
     
  10. Nikolokolus

    Nikolokolus There's always next year

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    30,704
    Likes Received:
    6,198
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Now that is a great theory ... and something that I actually think fits just about perfectly with this particular scenario. Clearly Williams is a 2 guard who can create a little bit, and it's not like Manu is getting any younger. A future backcourt of Hill and Williams, with the addition of Splitter means they maybe don't go into full tear down and rebuild mode right away but can instead groom Williams to be Manu's replacement when the time comes.

    I'm pretty sure the trade wouldn't be able to be consummated for a couple more months due to Williams being recently signed, so we could be in for quite the wait.
     
  11. EGame

    EGame "You're the only one of these fools I trust"

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2009
    Messages:
    10,976
    Likes Received:
    3,630
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Except B-Roy made a pretty decent point, that if they really wanted him, they could have just drafted him since they were ahead of us.
     
  12. Rastapopoulos

    Rastapopoulos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    41,767
    Likes Received:
    26,109
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Ballin'
    Nik: I think you can sign and trade rookies immediately.
    B-Roy: Did the Spurs even end up with Anderson? I don't see him on their Summer League Roster.
    Pinwheel: But Pop loves G-Hill more. It's well known that he's called him his fave player.
     
  13. Minstrel

    Minstrel Top Of The Pops Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    26,226
    Likes Received:
    14,407
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    User Interface Designer
    Location:
    Hello darkness, my old friend
    Maybe the Spurs wanted both the guy they drafted and Williams.
     

Share This Page