Then you made a statement about it making Pritchard culpable. Dear lord, what chance do any of us have if you can't even understand your own posts. BTW, you answered none of my questions yesterday EVER. you add no value to this board what so ever. Thank god for Minstreal and NateBishop
Before KP became GM: Roy LA Zach (now an all-star) Joel Raef LaFrenz (future cap space!) Darius (future cap space!) Martell Travis Jarrett Jack Sergio Ime
If what happened? That they called themselves the Three Amigos? How could anyone here possibly know the answer to that question? Reep provided a quote from Canzano using that term, but again, it sheds no light on who actually created the phrase (which I don't ever recall hearing from any of the Three Amigos, but then, I never transcribed every word they uttered in public, so I can't provide a direct quote). Are you extra busy at work these days? You seem all over the place in your posting and your logic these days.
As I said, Pritchard was a piece of shit who should have been fired. Unless, of course, he was actually involved in most of those deals.
Based on your post I see you are of the church of Steve Patterson OR are deliberately being dishonest about the players you believe he's responsible for so you can have 5 seconds of internet glory. If you think Patterson is responsible for all of that so be it. I won't waste my time trying to change your mind. You can go live in that world. I'll live in mine.
Still wondering how Reep's post quoting Canzano using the term "Three Amigos" in 2005 (without a link) answers Ed's evasive and vague "question" about how the term originated.
Hey, that was a hypothetical scenario, just as Ed provided. If you don't understand that, then perhaps you should eject from this thread. We won't miss you. To be clear, you were the one talking about "shuncles", right?
Nik as usual sees it right. I'll add that the second half of his comment was caused by the Oregonian's attitude. That hatred of our players was carried by the national media, which lowered trade values of our players. Plus, other teams knew Nash had a mandate to blow up the team. So Nash got less than what he gave.
...or just let his 18M come off their cap or S&T him at the end of the year where many more teams would have been able to bid for his services. Of the 4 options they went with by far the worst one netting older redundant talent (SAR) and an oft injured 5 on the downside of his career. Que sera sera... STOMP
1) you didn't respond to the question in the post. 2) you claim I said something I never did. more bullshit
