Game 4 vs Kings or Game 5 vs Spurs

Discussion in 'Los Angeles Lakers' started by Blaze, May 24, 2006.

  1. Blaze

    Blaze BBW Elite Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2006
    Messages:
    1,580
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Which game was better?2002, Game 4 West Finals Lakers vs. kingsRobert Horry hits game winning three pointer to tie series 2-2. Lakers go on to win in 7. 2004, Game 5 West Semis Lakers vs. SpursDerek Fisher hits miracle shot with 0.4 seconds left after Tim Duncan hit a shot to give spurs lead. lakers win game, go up 3-2, win series in 6.I say Game 5, because there was like three shots. first by kobe. then duncan. then fisher. it was a little more exciting.
     
  2. SirLaker

    SirLaker BBW MOD

    Joined:
    May 29, 2006
    Messages:
    7,725
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (AirBlaze @ May 24 2006, 09:45 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I say Game 5, because there was like three shots. first by kobe. then duncan. then fisher. it was a little more exciting.</div>yea i agree cuz it was more unexpected u kno?none the lessi loved THAT surprise [​IMG]
     
  3. melo

    melo Magic

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2003
    Messages:
    2,914
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Game 4, these are the reasons1- I hated the kings2- We were going for the 3 peat3- I have it on VHS.4 was a fluke. Horry's shot was clutch.
     
  4. SirLaker

    SirLaker BBW MOD

    Joined:
    May 29, 2006
    Messages:
    7,725
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Melo_061 @ May 30 2006, 05:50 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Game 4, these are the reasons.4 was a fluke. Horry's shot was clutch.</div>well i guess u could look at it like that
     
  5. ChuckTheD

    ChuckTheD BBW Elite Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    3,493
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Melo_061 @ May 30 2006, 05:50 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Game 4, these are the reasons1- I hated the kings2- We were going for the 3 peat3- I have it on VHS.4 was a fluke. Horry's shot was clutch.</div>Horry's shot was clutch, but the situation was definitely a fluke. Kobe missed a very makeable 6 or 7 foot runner (unusual), Shaq got the offensive rebound and missed an easy, contested layup (very unusual), Vlade couldn't get the rebound so he tapped it out, by some just ridiculous string of luck, Robert Horry is in the absolute perfect place to catch the tap like a pass and shoot it over the outstretched arm of Chris Webber for the win.Horry's is also a little sweeter because we won the chip that year.
     
  6. ballorama

    ballorama BBW Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2006
    Messages:
    331
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    In terms of exciteness im gonna have to go with .4 because we SILENCED the Spurs crowd after they thought they won with Duncans Jumper.But Horry's was more clutch no doubt, and we won the title.. AND AGAINST THE QUEENS!!
     
  7. Blaze

    Blaze BBW Elite Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2006
    Messages:
    1,580
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    I'm from Queens New York bi*ch! :biggrin: I guess Horry's shot was more clutch and they did win the championship that year, but imo for me Fisher's shot was more exciting.
     

Share This Page