Might This Have Blazers Ramifications? (McGrady/Pistons/Bulls)

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by ABM, Aug 8, 2010.

  1. ABM

    ABM Happily Married In Music City, USA!

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    31,865
    Likes Received:
    5,785
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Commercial Real Estate
    Location:
    Nashville, TN
    http://bleacherreport.com/articles/431505-mcgrady-could-sign-with-pistons

     
  2. ripcity67

    ripcity67 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2010
    Messages:
    194
    Likes Received:
    123
    Trophy Points:
    43
    I thought that McGrady was already out of the picture with the Bulls when they signed Bogans. Notsure how TM signing with the Pistons has nay bearing to the Blazers. I don't want Prince or RH.
     
  3. espn_hall_of_famer

    espn_hall_of_famer Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2009
    Messages:
    684
    Likes Received:
    47
    Trophy Points:
    28
    If I remember the sequence of events correct, an insider in Chicago said that a trade was due to happen Monday, 8/9, with Portland for Rudy. They then signed Bogans and that rumor was said to be in question since that would put them 3-deep at SG. But then the insider said the trade was still on the table for Rudy regardless of the Bogans signing. The rumor that Chicago signing McGrady would also be an obstacle in the way of Chicago trading for Rudy. So now this opens up the possibility that something will happen with Chicago and Portland since it was already reported something was in the works and that the Bogans signing didn't impact that deal in progress.
     
  4. BLAZER PROPHET

    BLAZER PROPHET Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    18,725
    Likes Received:
    191
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    dental malpractice claims adjuster
    Location:
    Portland area
    Just too iffy. Besides, if Cho is going to insist on Taj, the deal ain't getting done. Period.
     
  5. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,783
    Likes Received:
    27,542
    Trophy Points:
    113
    LOL, like the Blazers would make a trade. That's just silly, Tim.
     
  6. LameR

    LameR Ha Seung-Jin Approved!

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2005
    Messages:
    2,175
    Likes Received:
    137
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    Soccer Coach
    Location:
    Cincinnati
    Just trade him for a first rounder already!
     
  7. ABM

    ABM Happily Married In Music City, USA!

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    31,865
    Likes Received:
    5,785
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Commercial Real Estate
    Location:
    Nashville, TN
    The summer's still early. :)
     
  8. THE HCP

    THE HCP NorthEastPortland'sFinest

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    71,440
    Likes Received:
    60,133
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    N.E.P.
    I still believe Rudy can help our team.
     
  9. BLAZER PROPHET

    BLAZER PROPHET Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    18,725
    Likes Received:
    191
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    dental malpractice claims adjuster
    Location:
    Portland area
    I do, too. However, with Matthews we have too many SGs.
     
  10. Further

    Further Guy

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2008
    Messages:
    11,099
    Likes Received:
    4,039
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Stuff doer
    Location:
    Place
    Rudy can only help this team if he is willing to. If he is going to give it his all as a Blazer and not cause locker-room issues, then I would gladly accept him remaining on the team. But, I just don't see that happening. I understand Rudy's perspective, but it makes it very difficult for the Blazers to do anything but trade him.
     
  11. BLAZER PROPHET

    BLAZER PROPHET Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    18,725
    Likes Received:
    191
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    dental malpractice claims adjuster
    Location:
    Portland area
    We can carry only so many SG's. As it stands, we now have 5 and 4 of them have (to varying degrees) proven they deserve minutes. We can always try and play them out of position, but that's a consistent failed experiment. While I think Rudy can still be an asset, it is apparent that Vulcan has chosen to go with Matthews.
     
  12. Masbee

    Masbee -- Rookie of the Year

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,856
    Likes Received:
    97
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Just cause you keep saying it over and over and over, won't make any more true then it has been.

    Shooting guards on the Blazers roster who have proven they deserve minutes:

    Roy
    Matthews
    Rudy

    I count 3.

    Miller is a PG.

    Bayless may or may not ever develop into a full-time PG on offense, however, he is a PG on the defensive end. On this team, he is the backup point guard. He is NOT a 2.

    Batum is a 3.

    Babbitt is a rookie. Doesn't matter.

    Williams is a rookie. Doesn't matter.

    Johnson is a rookie. Doesn't matter.

    Patty Mills might as well be a rookie. Doesn't matter.

    Maybe you are looking at some other team's roster?
     
    HailBlazers likes this.
  13. HailBlazers

    HailBlazers RipCity

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Messages:
    19,995
    Likes Received:
    17,215
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    PDX
    Repped Mas
     
  14. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,783
    Likes Received:
    27,542
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Bayless is a guard, period. He is better than Rudy, so he should play ahead of Rudy. So that is 4 SG's who deserve playing time, and another, who is a first round pick, that probably should get time.
     
  15. espn_hall_of_famer

    espn_hall_of_famer Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2009
    Messages:
    684
    Likes Received:
    47
    Trophy Points:
    28
    I'd agree with Masbee on this. Defensively you need a PG and a SG to handle their respective opponents. Bayless is a PG and shouldn't be playing at the SG spot on defense. Rudy is a SG who shouldn't be playing PG on defense. So we only have 3 SG's who should be playing that position outside of some extreme roster adjustment.

    We do have a 4th SG in Williams who isn't even close to Rudy in production or rights to playing time, so he's really the one who is getting stinted by us keeping Rudy on the roster.
     

Share This Page