"Rand Paul Supporters Beat Woman To The Ground And Stomp Her Head"

Aw, honey. It's sweet that you're trying to create an opening to come into my life, but I just don't swing that way.

 

I wonder if you think the lady who rushed the SUV and hit Paul with a sign should be charged with assault? I haven't seen you comment on the video that I posted of what preceded the lady being "assaulted".

 

I don't think that video has anything to do with the statement you just quoted from maxiep. Not even close.

 

Take a breath and calm down.

She walked up and showed him the sign.

No contact was made.

The only "rusher" was the guy who tackled her.

 

The guys stomping her ARE his security detail, and like Paul himself, are rank amateurs.

 

As I said in a previous post, additional evidence is making me re-examine my initial reaction

http://legalinsurrection.blogspot.com/2010/10/new-video-exposes-false-narrative-of.html

My initial point was that violence has no place in politics and those that engage in that sort of behavior need to be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. I don't care which side that violence is on.

 

Can't ever talk about an issue without bringing up gender eh crandc?

ANYWAY, as others have mentioned, security should've been better, and that guy should be charged.

Also, think that people trying to make negative statements at opponents' rallies don't really belong (and do more harm for their cause by drawing negative attention), but that's another can of worms all together.

 

Why do you always do that? What do you hope to accomplish by talking down to people and patronizing them?

Don't you realize that even if your point is valid people will disagree with you because you're acting like a pompous ass?