Which is what, that our bench sucks or that Bayless is really good or just decent and not as sucky as what we have without him? I'm confused. All I was saying is defenses have figured out how to keep him off the line, taking away the major weapon you and others were bemoaning lacking with him gone. If you weren't trying to disprove that notion, then I'm not sure what we're talking about.
OK. It doesn't disprove your point. Does it support your assertion that the NBA has figured him out? Ed O.
How would one go about proving or disproving that? I would think the fact that he's been traded twice within a couple months speaks volumes... Nikolokolous said above, "his FTA's declined steadily as the season wore on last year." If that can be supported by game log data, then that's about as good as we're going to come up with one way or the other. Otherwise, we're left with just opinions.
