How do you use diplomacy with people like this?

Discussion in 'Blazers OT Forum' started by BrianFromWA, Dec 13, 2010.

  1. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,096
    Likes Received:
    9,073
    Trophy Points:
    113
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/13/AR2010121300133.html

    NK has already, in the last 18 months:
    1) Fired missiles into the ocean near Japan
    2) Torpedoed a South Korean warship and threatened total war if sanctions were increased.
    3) Launched artillery attacks on South Korean-held islands

    and now is threatening nuclear war if a planned and announced annual exercise occurs. I'd like to hear ideas people have of how they would like their government to handle (or ignore) this.
     
    Last edited: Dec 13, 2010
  2. barfo

    barfo triggered obsessive commie pinko boomer maniac Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    34,341
    Likes Received:
    25,364
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Blazer OT board
    I suggest construction of a large set of fake, but believable and very embarrassing documents focused on the Chinese/NK relationship and give them to WikiLeaks.

    barfo
     
  3. EL PRESIDENTE

    EL PRESIDENTE Username Retired in Honor of Lanny.

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    50,346
    Likes Received:
    22,532
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I called this would happen way back when those two Al Gore documentary employees were bartered for. I speculated it was a "look the other way" type of deal.
     
  4. MARIS61

    MARIS61 Real American

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,007
    Likes Received:
    5,012
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired Yankee
    Location:
    Beautiful Central Oregon
    Since we and Japan and S Korea deliberately provoked most of these defensive reactions in order to make N Korea look like madmen, I guess it's already planned out. I suspect we are planning an all-out invasion.
     
  5. huevonkiller

    huevonkiller Change (Deftones)

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2006
    Messages:
    25,798
    Likes Received:
    90
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Occupation:
    Student.
    Location:
    Miami, Florida
    I wouldn't mind if we invaded, it could turn into a useful term paper subject for me.
     
  6. NJNetz

    NJNetz BBW Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2004
    Messages:
    14,413
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Can we nuke them first and fast?
     
  7. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,096
    Likes Received:
    9,073
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This would be a good point for you to read some history.

    For one thing, SCUD missiles aren't defensive missiles.
    For another, Japan has no offensive capability (and haven't since 1945). It's mandated by the surrender treaty. Which they've kept, unlike the terms of the cease-fire that NK doesn't seem to want to abide by.
    Third, torpedoing a warship in water that doesn't belong to you isn't considered "defensive"
    Fourth, I fail to see how bombarding a civilian island that belongs to another sovereign nation can be anything "defensive"
    Fifth, you cannot come up with a single "deliberate provocation" that caused the nuclear testing in violation of UN regulations and despite sanctions
    Sixth, we don't have the troops if we pulled from the entire military to conduct an "all-out invasion".
    At least you agree that their actions are those of madmen. I didn't see a response on what you would do about it (ignore them, I guess?)

    Is it your position that we should not conduct multi-national exercises?
     
    Last edited: Dec 14, 2010
  8. BLAZER PROPHET

    BLAZER PROPHET Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    18,725
    Likes Received:
    191
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    dental malpractice claims adjuster
    Location:
    Portland area
    There's only one thing bullies understand.

    Force.

    That's my solution.

    If I were President and NK or Iran... torpedoed one of our ships there'd be repercussions they would regret for many years to come.
     
  9. Colonel Ronan

    Colonel Ronan Continue...?

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Messages:
    19,410
    Likes Received:
    169
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    Control Center analyst
    Location:
    Reading, UK
    Wow, you're so cool.

    Good luck taking out all their nuclear silos. If USA were to make a move, it definitely wouldn't be a nuclear bomb. If NK so much as smell a Yank near their border they'll launch their whole arsenal at the US - It would be a cluster fuck.

    If there was an all out war I'd enlist in a heartbeat though.
     
  10. BLAZER PROPHET

    BLAZER PROPHET Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    18,725
    Likes Received:
    191
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    dental malpractice claims adjuster
    Location:
    Portland area
    HAHAHAHA!!

    No wonder you cry a lot.

    It's a matter of having some balls. We had people like Hitler, Bin Laden, Hussein... because people wouldn't stand up to them. When people do, we never hear about them because they go away.

    Read your history. Bullies are cowards. Punch them in the nose, they go away. I've lived my life that way and have never seen it any different.
     
  11. Colonel Ronan

    Colonel Ronan Continue...?

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Messages:
    19,410
    Likes Received:
    169
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    Control Center analyst
    Location:
    Reading, UK
    You obviously didn't read my post.

    When did I say you shouldn't invade NK with force? I just said that attacking NK would be a bad move no matter what tactic you use.

    Oh, I can tell that you're fat and that your favourite food is meatloaf. Damn Septics.
     
  12. BLAZER PROPHET

    BLAZER PROPHET Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    18,725
    Likes Received:
    191
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    dental malpractice claims adjuster
    Location:
    Portland area
    Rather than responding to your childish and personal insults with the same, let me say that I still would have sunk that sub or at least sank one of theirs (at a minimum). And guess what? It doesn't happen again. When a government shows weakness to an avowed enemy, why should it expect the bully to stop? I think I can guarantee you that NK would not have nuked Sk if it had responded with a bitch slap. NK would have respected it and backed down. Instead, they bombed SK and still SK whimpered away. SK got what they deserved. Disrespect.
     
  13. Colonel Ronan

    Colonel Ronan Continue...?

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Messages:
    19,410
    Likes Received:
    169
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    Control Center analyst
    Location:
    Reading, UK
    That's because SK would get absolutely raped. The pay off isn't even worth it. World powers on the other hand...

    PS. Does that mean my insults are true?
     
  14. BLAZER PROPHET

    BLAZER PROPHET Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    18,725
    Likes Received:
    191
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    dental malpractice claims adjuster
    Location:
    Portland area
    Well, we can agree to disagree on SK. I can respect that.

    As to your insults, I'm a little above those. Maybe start an insult thread and I'll join in.
     
  15. Colonel Ronan

    Colonel Ronan Continue...?

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Messages:
    19,410
    Likes Received:
    169
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    Control Center analyst
    Location:
    Reading, UK
    At least you don't bitch about them.
     
  16. bluefrog

    bluefrog Go Blazers, GO!

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    1,964
    Likes Received:
    81
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Occupation:
    Programmer
    Location:
    New Bern
    The key issue is China won't get on board with an invasion. Just last week they sent some delegates to show support to NK.

    The other issue is the citizenry is essentially being held hostage. Do we try to minimize civilian casualties or do we just bomb the shit out of the country until they surrender?

    One solution would be get as many players in the region to participate in a massive land invasion. South Korea would obviously have to commit. Japan has some offensive capabilities, like fighter jets and tanks. U.S. and Russia could fill in as much as possible. China would possibly tolerate the invasion but they would never participate. A few strategic bombing would disable any nuclear capabilities in the North.

    The other option would be taking out the leadership in a bombing campaign like we did in Iraq. We would still need to dispatch thousands of troops to handle the transition. The people might be so brainwashed that we could see an insurgence there too.
     
  17. TradeNurkicNow

    TradeNurkicNow piss

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    5,196
    Likes Received:
    676
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    hell
    Location:
    shit
    Can't we just nuke Ronan?
     
  18. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    We basically have to rely on China to invade from the North. Seoul is so close to the border with NK that it'd be an easy target for lots of short range munitions that NK certainly has. Seoul is the hostage that keeps us from doing anything at all about it.
     
  19. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,096
    Likes Received:
    9,073
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The thing most people don't (won't?) understand is that if NK has the element of surprise (they have over 1M active troops and almost 10M reserves with military training) they're going to go through SK like crap through a goose. Just like the summer of 1950. Even if we mobilized every soldier, sailor and Marine (active and reserve) and magically transported them to Seoul, we'd be outnumbered 4-to-1. I don't think you could effectively mobilize the South Korean reserve in time to take defensive positions and thwart a surprise assault.

    Their nukes can't come close to the US. That's not the issue. It's that they CAN reach South Korea and Japan, and their targeting isn't that great.

    It seems the consensus I'm getting is that we should enlist China's help in a full-scale invasion. Why not a strike against political leadership? Does anyone think Kim Jong Il is a nicer (or more sane) guy than Saddam?
     
  20. barfo

    barfo triggered obsessive commie pinko boomer maniac Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    34,341
    Likes Received:
    25,364
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Blazer OT board
    KJI seems like a signficantly greater threat than Saddam ever could have been. Makes you wonder about our choice of targets, doesn't it?

    barfo
     

Share This Page