NY Times: Too Soon for Roy's Return?

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by Shooter, Feb 8, 2011.

  1. Shooter

    Shooter Unanimously Great

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2008
    Messages:
    5,484
    Likes Received:
    152
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    advertising
    Location:
    Blazerville
    http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2011/02/08/sports/basketball/AP-BKN-Roys-Return.html?_r=1&hp
     
  2. hasoos

    hasoos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    9,418
    Likes Received:
    97
    Trophy Points:
    48
    What Roy return too soon? What kind of history do draw that conclusion from? :NOTMARIS:
     
  3. Shooter

    Shooter Unanimously Great

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2008
    Messages:
    5,484
    Likes Received:
    152
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    advertising
    Location:
    Blazerville
    It's ridiculous that management is even considering letting him come back this weekend. Haven't we learned our lesson?
     
  4. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,775
    Likes Received:
    27,532
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They need to rush him back, this team is only has a .615 winning% since he went out December 15th.

    For those of you playing at home, or not able to access a calculator, Orlando has a .615 winning% for the year, and they are 32-20
     
  5. Shooter

    Shooter Unanimously Great

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2008
    Messages:
    5,484
    Likes Received:
    152
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    advertising
    Location:
    Blazerville
    Yeah, I like the way we're playing, and I'm afraid we're going to revert back to the old walk-it-up, isolation-style of basketball that Roy likes. I'd rather he stay out awhile longer and let us keep rolling. The fact that we've beaten the Spurs and the Bulls without him tells me that Roy is not as crucial to our success as we've thought.
     
  6. The_Lillard_King

    The_Lillard_King Westside

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    12,405
    Likes Received:
    310
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Roy has been sitting on the sidelines watching what LA has been doing. He knows what is going on with this team. He said he expects to come off the bench. Roy coming back is a good thing.

    As far as if it is too early . . . I'm guessing the Drs are on hyper conservative mode with teh Blazers, so if the docs now say it's up to Roy and his pain tolerance level, I'm guessing Roy is as good to go as he can be.
     
  7. chris_in_pdx

    chris_in_pdx OLD MAN

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    4,847
    Likes Received:
    1,970
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If.... *IF*.... Roy embraces the bench role, and provides an offensive spark for the 2nd unit, his return could be the catalyst for a deep playoff run.

    That's a huge if.
     
  8. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,775
    Likes Received:
    27,532
    Trophy Points:
    113
    IF, and that's a BIG IF, Roy can really come back and be happy with a secondary role off the bench, then this is a good thing. If Roy comes back and does what I expect him to do, which is say the right things for a while and then start bitching like he has done many times before, then this is not a good thing
     
  9. BBert

    BBert Weasels Ripped My Flesh

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    26,622
    Likes Received:
    20,298
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Poster Boy
    Location:
    Blazerlandia
    That's an amazing stat, mm. I agree with T_of_B. At least I hope it is so. Brandon needs to fit in off the bench, and he should be smart enough to realize that by now. If he can, that improvement in bench play will help this team all the way down the line, and allow for more rest for our starters.
     
  10. BBert

    BBert Weasels Ripped My Flesh

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    26,622
    Likes Received:
    20,298
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Poster Boy
    Location:
    Blazerlandia
    It's funny. T_of_B posted my hopes. Mediocre Man posted my fears. :)
     
  11. HailBlazers

    HailBlazers RipCity

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Messages:
    19,974
    Likes Received:
    17,185
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    PDX
    I too am very weary of him coming back too soon, but in reality it doesn't matter when he comes back the damage to his knees is already done. Hopefully the latest surgery has truly relieved some pain.
     
  12. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,775
    Likes Received:
    27,532
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Oh ya, him coming back now or next season won't make a bit of difference to his knees. They can't be repaired, and it's up to him to just deal with the pain. I guess if nothing else, coming back too soon might lead to an earlier medical retirement from Roy?
     
  13. hasoos

    hasoos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    9,418
    Likes Received:
    97
    Trophy Points:
    48
    All kidding aside, all we can really do is let Roy listen to his body and make decisions. The best thing that could happen is that he comes back and is BRoy. The worst that can happen, is the situation we are already in.
     
  14. Pinwheel1

    Pinwheel1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    23,192
    Likes Received:
    15,646
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ruining the chemistry of this team is a concern? Coming back healthy is the one and only concern. Everything else can be fixed in time, except bad knees.
     
  15. hasoos

    hasoos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    9,418
    Likes Received:
    97
    Trophy Points:
    48
    How much is that chemistry worth if we are merely above .500?

    I think the thing I am worried the most is Lamarcus will start to defer again. That is my biggest fear.
     
  16. RoyToy

    RoyToy Clown Town

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    10,977
    Likes Received:
    297
    Trophy Points:
    83
    They still do this now
     
  17. Pinwheel1

    Pinwheel1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    23,192
    Likes Received:
    15,646
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Exactly.

    I don't think the problem was LMA defering. The problem was that everyone else defered. Roy is/was not a PG. I said last year LMA would be a allstar with cp3. He is close with Miller. If Miller runs the offense, LMA will be fine. I am guessing Roy sees that now.
     
    Last edited: Feb 8, 2011
  18. blazerboy30

    blazerboy30 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    5,465
    Likes Received:
    423
    Trophy Points:
    83
    As MM posted, since Roy went down, we are playing at 0.615%. That is quite a bit above 0.500.
     
  19. e_blazer

    e_blazer Rip City Fan

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    24,187
    Likes Received:
    30,322
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Consultant
    Location:
    Oregon City, OR
    Perhaps if we get Roy and Camby back we can play at 65 to 70%. For certain, I don't see how a team playing basically a 7 player or so rotation keeps winning at a 62% clip.
     
  20. illmatic99

    illmatic99 formerly yuyuza1

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    57,711
    Likes Received:
    56,216
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    NYstateofmind
    We had 6 players play yesterday. They played: 46, 44, 42, 38, 34, and 23 mins each.

    All well above their season averages. Any help that comes from BRoy should be seen as a relief, not as a detriment to our team. Roy is a smart player and there should not be any doubt that his primary goal is to help the team win, and he will do what is required of him and nothing more.

    It's Nate I'm worried about, and hope he won't rush Brandon back into the iso-fest.
     

Share This Page