<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>discussions with several teams, but declined to go into details. It?s almost a foregone conclusion the Bucks will deal veteran center Jamaal Magloire. It is believed Harris is mulling trades offer from at least three teams.Among the teams that have been linked to Magloire are Atlanta, Toronto, Utah and Golden State. There was also a rumor floating around Tuesday that the Washington Wizards may pursue Magloire as well.With Magloire, the Bucks seemingly have the ammo to acquire either Troy Murphy from Golden State or Carlos Boozer from Utah. Both Murphy and Boozer are available, and both are power forwards, a position the Bucks want to bolster. However, both players have large and lengthy contracts, which Bucks owner Herb Kohl might be reluctant to take on.The Bucks are also fielding offers for backup guard Mo Williams and forward Joe Smith. Williams, an explosive scorer, has piqued the curiosity of a spate of teams. The Bucks could likely get a mid first-round pick for Williams, but considering this is a rather weak draft, they might not be able to draft a player with abilities comparable to Williams.</div> I'd rather not trade Joe Smith, he's been a injured but good defender/rebounder for us, very good backup. Troy Murphy or Carlos Boozer? Yuck, no way in hell. I will be pissed if we trade Williams and even more pissed if it's a draftpick or player with less value.
How about this 3 team deal:Bucks get: Dunleavy, Taft and ScalabrineWarriors get: Magloire and Charlie BellCeltics get: FisherWarriors why?: They need a center bad. They use the pick in the draft that they would have most likely used on O'Bryant to take one of the talent 3's in the draft to back up Pietrus. Bell will take the place of Fisher and would be worth giving up to get a decent center.Bucks why?: Get solid all around player in Dunleavy who can battle Simmons for the starting 3 spot. I believe Taft will be a good 4 with some time. Bring him off the bench behind Smith for now while he develops. Scalabrine is a 3/4, they need depth at both of those positions, although he is not the best player he is bench player that will add some depth.Boston why?: Get solid veteran point while not giving up anything(or much at all).Just a trade I would love to see which I think benefits all teams(but I'm sure you can tell I am a C's fan by it haha).
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (DRob-50-Forever @ Jun 21 2006, 06:45 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>How about this 3 team deal:Warriors get: Dunleavy, Taft and ScalabrineBucks get: Magloire and Charlie Bell</div>That would keep some players with their original teams.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Sham @ Jun 21 2006, 08:42 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>That would keep some players with their original teams.</div>My bad. You know what I mean you spammer. :brucelee:
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (DRob-50-Forever @ Jun 21 2006, 08:45 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>How about this 3 team deal:Warriors get: Dunleavy, Taft and ScalabrineBucks get: Magloire and Charlie BellCeltics get: FisherWarriors why?: They need a center bad. They use the pick in the draft that they would have most likely used on O'Bryant to take one of the talent 3's in the draft to back up Pietrus. Bell will take the place of Fisher and would be worth giving up to get a decent center.Bucks why?: Get solid all around player in Dunleavy who can battle Simmons for the starting 3 spot. I believe Taft will be a good 4 with some time. Bring him off the bench behind Smith for now while he develops. Scalabrine is a 3/4, they need depth at both of those positions, although he is not the best player he is bench player that will add some depth.Boston why?: Get solid veteran point while not giving up anything(or much at all).Just a trade I would love to see which I think benefits all teams(but I'm sure you can tell I am a C's fan by it haha).</div>That trade is messed up. bucks already have Magloire and bell, warriors already have Dunleavy and Taft. I'm confused.
HE MESSED UP!!!! u know what he meant to put though....Well, the celtics would be killing in this trade. They are basically trading Scabs for Derek Fisher...haha. I dont see this being a 3 team deal. The celtics dont belong in this.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (nba dogmatist @ Jun 22 2006, 11:05 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>That trade is messed up. bucks already have Magloire and bell, warriors already have Dunleavy and Taft. I'm confused. </div>You get confused quite easily, I messed up, read the post right above yours... The reason I have Fisher and the C's in the deal is so the Warriors make room for Bell and there had been rumors of Fisher being traded aswell. Once again I messed up, just thought it was so obvious so I didn't edit it, but I guess not, I will edit it now for some of the slower members. :happy0144:
